Clarke is responsible for the order. I'm over Watson but if he must be played there is no justification for putting him any higher than 6. The lower he is the less damage his consistent failure will do to us.Clarke isn't a selector so telling him would be pointless
Especially if we win this test and the series is over get rid of Rogers and Watson and blood this top 3 in the 2 dead rubbers:
1. Warner
2. That Guy
3. Silk
The top 3 of the future.
Clarke is responsible for the order. I'm over Watson but if he must be played there is no justification for putting him any higher than 6. The lower he is the less damage his consistent failure will do to us.
Please tell me what other team would put up with a number 3 who has played 49 tests for 3 100s?
I'm not following - who is your number 2?