T-Boon
Coach
- Messages
- 16,051
Warner is more suited to 5 or 6, at Test level surely?
you should rethink that, because thats what I think.
Warner is more suited to 5 or 6, at Test level surely?
Warner is more suited to 5 or 6, at Test level surely?
Already written off Handscombe? Patterson should have been picked over Maddinson. Still interested to see how he goes though.We need a 5 &6 and a keeper.maddison may turn out a good 5, not sure on the 6.
Already written off Handscombe? Patterson should have been picked over Maddinson
I'll be more impressed with Khawaja when he scores a hundred. Needs to go on with starts.
I'll be more impressed with Khawaja when he scores a hundred. Needs to go on with starts.
There is an argument for it.
Ive been harping on about it all week but australias real problem has been the middle order. like yeah we have collapsed a few times but there is an expectation that once the top 4 are out the whole side is out.
Like if we look at england their top order (well cook and root) have been outstanding which has allowed their 5,6,7 to score a lot of runs. bairstow is leading the world in runs scored in 2016.
The rot started imo with voges, marsh and nevill as harsh as that is.
Warner at 5. Solves 2 problems. He's not going anywhere, but he doesn't have a Test match openers mindset. Meanwhile, you've got Voges stinking it up at 5.
Warner to 5 would be a great move....you just got to figure out who your 2 openers are.