- Messages
- 62,358
Australia's bowler were not bowling well.To be fair we should have gotten this many runs on this pitch. Our bowlers were bowling well today they had it swinging a bit and Lyon did his best. Difference is they let wide balls go to the keeper why we played them back on our stumps also we have dropped crucial catches especially Cook on 66.
Bird was rubbish, Cummins can't bowl maidens, Lyon was bowling flatter than ever and Marsh was barely used.
Hazlewood was the only one with genuine pace and was harder to get hit. The problem with short bowling is that you remove so many ways to get a batsmen out, and it is an expensive way to get a wicket in Test cricket. As we saw yesterday.
Woakes and Broad copped far too much short stuff. Both survived for an hour each. That is waaaay way too long. Two hours it took to get three lower order batsmen out, one of whom, the lowest ranked of all, scored a half century.
It was like Smith was captaining an ODI side protecting a lead. Unbelievably bad captaincy. As Twiz said, he lacked a second plan. Constantly changing Fast Medium bowlers who bowled too short, with other Fast Medium bowlers who bowled too short produced zero variation for the batsmen. He was forcing a square peg into a round hole. Dumbest captaincy I've seen in Test cricket for a long time. Mainly because he persisted with the plan for so long, and as yet, has not opted to try something else.
England bowled 31 maidens in 110 overs
Australia has bowled 21 maidens in 144 overs
No pressure being built at all. Just over after over of stupid ineffective bowling to crap batsmen