timka4
Bench
- Messages
- 2,505
Exactly what my back line would beI'd like to see this backline
1. Dugan
2. Hayne
3. Jennings
4. Lyon/Lawrence
5. Uate
6. Carney
7. Pearce
Exactly what my back line would beI'd like to see this backline
1. Dugan
2. Hayne
3. Jennings
4. Lyon/Lawrence
5. Uate
6. Carney
7. Pearce
1. Kurt Gidley (c)
2. Akuila Uate
3. Jamie Lyon
4. Michael Jennings
5. Jarryd Hayne
6. Todd Carney
7. Mitchell Pearce
14. Josh Dugan
I think Dugan would be more effective if he comes on against tired opponents, rather than the Queenslanders belting the sh*t out of him right from the get go. Gids to start but after 20-30 minutes, shift to hooker and bring Dugan on at fullback.
Slater started his SOO career on the wing and bench didnt he?
RHCP's idea is not so crazy
This. We need two specialists props on the bench next year. Not a 2nd rower to slot inbut why waste a bench position on a specialist fb when our props and hooker are our weak points. frankly we need all the forwards we can get on the bench otherwise we're going to be done in again. our backline, if selected correctly and consistently, is fine and we don't need another jamal idris selection on the bench.
Yes, Slater started out on the wing. Matt Bowen has played plenty of games off the bench as well.Slater started his SOO career on the wing and bench didnt he?
RHCP's idea is not so crazy
besthalfbackPEARCE said:but why waste a bench position on a specialist fb when our props and hooker are our weak points. frankly we need all the forwards we can get on the bench otherwise we're going to be done in again. our backline, if selected correctly and consistently, is fine and we don't need another jamal idris selection on the bench.
timka4 said:This. We need two specialists props on the bench next year. Not a 2nd rower to slot in
14. Prop
15. Prop
16. Second Rower
17. Kidley (Utility, Comes on 2nd Half, we don't need to rush him on in first half just for the sake of it)
IMO.
I think that he's going to be targetted by Queensland and that he could be more effective if he played 60 minutes in Game One than if he played 80.
I wouldn't be upset if he started, I just think it's an option that could benefit the side.
http://www.newcastleknights.com.au/?s=article-display&id=30984UATE ELIGIBLE FOR VB KANGAROOS SELECTION
ARL
3/10/2010 10:36:00 PM
The Executive of the Rugby League International Federation (RLIF) has today approved the change of international eligibility application of Akuila Uate.
Uate will now be available for selection for the VB Kangaroos in the upcoming Four Nations tournament.
The VB Kangaroos team will be announced tommorrow, Monday 4 October, at ARL Headquarters.
they did this in 08 i think (not sure). brett stewart came off the bench while gidley started. it was a stupid game plan. dugan should play 80 or not at all, and haven't we moved on from gidley at fb? what about hayne or stewart?
This whole thread is pointless - Uate won't make the NSW origin team at full strength anyway.