Talk of going back to 5m because of this is ridiculous.
A 5m rule will stop a lot of big collisions, but not tackles like this.
One of the NRLs biggest issuee jerk reactions.
Talk of going back to the 5m rule is just that.
you never see Yawnion journos and players saying ban scrums to stop broken necks
it's a disgrace the way the NRL journos use unfortunate incidents like these to bag out the game and make out it's not safe and you should not let your kids play it
won't be long before they write an article after they've rung a Doctor who will say the game should be banned
they seem to not care about Mckinnon one bit
Five metres? What kind of rugby league does that encourage? Not the expansive kind!
the leading try scorer in aussie league history is who? what position did he play? What era?
the leading try scorer in aussie league history is who? what position did he play? What era?
Nobody knows yet if he'll be ok or not. The spinal cord has not been severed but there can be a level of damage without severing it. That level of damage could have an impact. Hopefully he is fine as soon as possible.
What annoyed me was the idiotic analysis of the commentators. You could clearly see he was panicked, there was what I interpreted as him reaching for his mouth guard and being unable to get to it with a clearly alarmed look on his face. And then the dickhead commentators are like "he moved a bit, he'll be fine".
These meatheads should not be giving medical opinion when they are clearly ignorant.
people just don't think ... they assume that with a 5m defence the attack will get smashed .. wingers/centre were scoring tries long before the 10m rule was thought of .. it just required decent halves, forwards with offloads and the attacking side not to play flat ..
I have no doubt that the coaches in the game today would be able to come up with game plans to score points with a 5m defensive line ... it also encourages skilful attack ...
The biggest two blights on rugby league are the wrestle in the ruck and the over dependence on dummy half running .. both are addressed with a shorter defensive line and getting the attack back ...
people just don't think ... they assume that with a 5m defence the attack will get smashed .. wingers/centre were scoring tries long before the 10m rule was thought of .. it just required decent halves, forwards with offloads and the attacking side not to play flat ..
I have no doubt that the coaches in the game today would be able to come up with game plans to score points with a 5m defensive line ... it also encourages skilful attack ...
The biggest two blights on rugby league are the wrestle in the ruck and the over dependence on dummy half running .. both are addressed with a shorter defensive line and getting the attack back ...
A 5 or 7metre rule would bring back the legs tackle as the primary form of defence, no need to wrestle so the defensive line can get on-side.
Slightly off topic.....
My main issue with this incident is that the Melbourne player wasn't sent off.
We can argue about the suspension all we want, but I believe if an act of foul play results in a player not returning, they should be sent. 1 penalty can't compensate for playing with 16 players.
if they ever changed it back to the 5m rule the DT journos would go off their brain
the same way they do for not changing it
No chance.
Offloading would become even more important with the 5m rule IMO.
My son fractured his C3 and C4 in a car crash, it bent his spinal cord.
Was in an induced coma for two weeks, took him 12 months to learn to walk again and he still has close to no feeling in his left hand (that is he can feel something, but I could burn or put a nail through it and it would not hurt). This was 4 years ago.
He considers himself lucky, he walked out of a spinal unit, most do not.