I must have missed the part of the 'Rules of the Octagon' graphic where that was on it...
:roll:
The irony with that statement is your asking the challenger to do so something the champion hasn't done for almost half a decade...
Lol Don't be so anal bro obviously it's not in the rules of the octagon. I wasn't quoting the rules of the octagon when I made that statement but ill be more clearer for you in future.
Like I said I wouldn't hav complained if it went the other way Hendricks prob did enough to win it but at the end of the day when your in a title against one of the GOAT's your gonna have to be more decisive to get nod from the judges IMO. Same thing happened to Gustafson I thought he could have got the decision but when it's close like that it often goes to the champ. Especially when the champ is GSP who is a decision specialist.
If a rematch doesn't happen and GSP rides into the sunset, a fight between Lawler and Hendricks for the vacated title would be the way to go, just as Lawler suggested it.
Also don't know if Rashad was that good or chael was that bad, but loved seeing Rashad get the win, one of my favourites.