The difference is carch doesn't start twenty gazillions threads expressing his love for flanno or blaming flanno for every woe no matter how tenuous on flanno
Also S73's les are so clumsy as to make himself a figure of ridicule
There are plenty of other vocal opponents of flanno who don't resort to constant dishonesty and stick to criticising flannos all too real and numerous faults
As yet no one has answered a credible question carch asks the "sack flanno immediately" crowd
Who is available and willing to replace him immediately and are they an improvement
Please state the criteria for this question.
Because this question can be judged on numerous different merits.
As you've mentioned above, people refer to Flanno's faults for his criticism, yet if you were to name any old coach who's available that may have areas in which they may excel compared to Flanno, they will get hounded down on perception alone without a criteria.
For the record, I don't disagree with Carch's thoughts on paying out coaches mid contract.
However I also can't continue walking down a road I believe to be the wrong one. Whether the decision to extend was made to cover asses at the time or not.
In reference to the question on is there any better coach available... who here would have taken Robinson or Maquire before they were given a gig at NRL level?
Are you telling me there are no potential coaches out there that could prove themselves? Are we really just sticking to the top couple of coaches at other clubs NOW and hoping they up and go or that we can over pay them to come across?
