Beau Scott appreciation thread

[Chicken_Hunter]

Injuries and general all round plodiness. He's got starch, but not much else.

 

[Twizzle]

lol at the beau scott love. You guys just wait.

To play Newcastle ?

Yeh, cant wait for that.

 

[Bigfella]

Watmough's output on the field was better than Scott's.

What a load of shit.

That's not an invitation for three hundred pages of bullshit statistics.

Like the ones used to "prove" that junior Paolo is no good.

What Scott has brought to the team on field is massively greater than what watmough did.

 

[Joshuatheeel]

What Scott has brought to the team on field is massively greater than what watmough did.

Maybe / Maybe not, but don't forget Scott is playing in a side with Gordon / Jennings / Foran while Watmough had Kelly/Sandow/Robinson/hoppa as team mates. Surely that would make him look better.

 

[emjaycee]

Who f**ken cares whether Scott brings more to the team than Watmough or not.

Can't we be happy that in 2016 we HAVE a competitive squad that is currently 3 from 4 despite having played 3 of last years semi-finalists, has the best defensive record of the year so far, has 3 current rep players in our run on side, has another 3 former SoO players in our top 25 and has another 3 or 4 fringe/potential rep players as well as 4 more who play for their minnow countries.

Last year we didn't win enough games to make the 8, this year we are currently sitting on the same amount of wins as the ladder leaders. If Beau Scott has been part of that - excellent. If Watmough was fit and was part of that - excellent, if not hopefully when (if) he comes back he adds to the squad and doesn't take away from it.

Seriously all this comparison shit and arguments about whom is better than whom gets really boring sometimes.

**rant over**

 

[Dibs]

lol at the beau scott love. You guys just wait.

Sour grapes anyone?

 

[yy_cheng]

Who f**ken cares whether Scott brings more to the team than Watmough or not.

Can't we be happy that in 2016 we HAVE a competitive squad that is currently 3 from 4 despite having played 3 of last years semi-finalists, has the best defensive record of the year so far, has 3 current rep players in our run on side, has another 3 former SoO players in our top 25 and has another 3 or 4 fringe/potential rep players as well as 4 more who play for their minnow countries.

Last year we didn't win enough games to make the 8, this year we are currently sitting on the same amount of wins as the ladder leaders. If Beau Scott has been part of that - excellent. If Watmough was fit and was part of that - excellent, if not hopefully when (if) he comes back he adds to the squad and doesn't take away from it.

Seriously all this comparison shit and arguments about whom is better than whom gets really boring sometimes.

**rant over**

So who's better?

 

[emjaycee]

So who's better?

Seffa

 

[hineyrulz]

What a load of shit.

That's not an invitation for three hundred pages of bullshit statistics.

Like the ones used to "prove" that junior Paolo is no good.

What Scott has brought to the team on field is massively greater than what watmough did.

x10000000.

Pou will do anything to promote an arguement.

 

[IFR33K]

Poo baits people, and loves it.

I just don't understand why peeps keep coming back for more.

 

[Gary Gutful]

Who f**ken cares whether Scott brings more to the team than Watmough or not.

Can't we be happy that in 2016 we HAVE a competitive squad that is currently 3 from 4 despite having played 3 of last years semi-finalists, has the best defensive record of the year so far, has 3 current rep players in our run on side, has another 3 former SoO players in our top 25 and has another 3 or 4 fringe/potential rep players as well as 4 more who play for their minnow countries.

Last year we didn't win enough games to make the 8, this year we are currently sitting on the same amount of wins as the ladder leaders. If Beau Scott has been part of that - excellent. If Watmough was fit and was part of that - excellent, if not hopefully when (if) he comes back he adds to the squad and doesn't take away from it.

Seriously all this comparison shit and arguments about whom is better than whom gets really boring sometimes.

**rant over**

What would you prefer people talk about?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

x10000000.

Pou will do anything to promote an arguement.

I'm not the one who put shit on Watmough in a thread about Beau Scott.

 

[Gary Gutful]

There you go again you argumentative merkin ](*,)

 

[hineyrulz]

I'm not the one who put shit on Watmough in a thread about Beau Scott.

No, you only put shit on players who do well for us.

 

[Dibs]

No, you only put shit on players who do well for us.

In Pou's defence he defended a player who arguably has done shit all for us. (Not my opinion I think watmough contributed fairly under the conditions last year but I certainly wouldn't dismiss the argument by some that his output was minimal)

 

[hineyrulz]

Watmough was solid last season, defensively very good but pretty average in attack bar his last few games.

Beau Scott has been in our top 2 or 3 players every week. Something you could never say about Watmough last season.

 

[Gary Gutful]

I reckon Watmough was in our top 2 or 3 players every week last season.

 

[hineyrulz]

I reckon Watmough was in our top 2 or 3 players every week last season.

His first month was pretty poor, he got better as the season went on. Beau has hit the ground running.

But you can't deny once Watmough got injured our line speed dropped significantly.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

No, you only put shit on players who do well for us.

Only when you merkins think they can do no wrong and we should spend whatever it takes to retain them.

#JustGetItDoneFFS!!!

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Watmough was solid last season, defensively very good but pretty average in attack bar his last few games.

Beau Scott has been in our top 2 or 3 players every week. Something you could never say about Watmough last season.

So you think Scott's attack has been comparable to that of Manu Ma'u?