hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 153,962
Where did I say that???So you think Scott's attack has been comparable to that of Manu Ma'u?
You don't think he's been in our top 3 players this first month???
Where did I say that???So you think Scott's attack has been comparable to that of Manu Ma'u?
Watmough started playing better when he realized he's not a 5/8th
Where did I say that???
You don't think he's been in our top 3 players this first month???
Pfft Scott has not had nearly enough Botox to be mentioned in the same sentence of watmo
You just mentioned them both in the same sentence.
Surely a team is better off having an inspiring defender who's a mediocre attacker, than having a bunch of players who are only OK at both?
Surely a team is better off having an inspiring defender who's a mediocre attacker, than having a bunch of players who are only OK at both?
That Hooper merkin just agreed with me about Scott inspiring the Eels defence. I completely retract my argument.
No because his attack has been ordinary. I agree he's been one of our best defenders, and I'm sure we bought him for that reason alone. But his lack of attack drops him out of our top three players, for mine.
That said, he is very noticeable in defence - he's smart, aggressive and technically excellent. Little things like holding the wrist of the attacker's ball carrying arm, and the way he repositions himself to get under the attacker and stop them getting to ground quickly. f**king awesome. And I love a bit of surreptitious niggle too. Merkins must hate playing against him.
But he's not even in our top ten attackers, IMO.