Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Neither do the Thunder. Without Warner or Gayle, not a lot... being 4/28 (could have been 5 if the LBW decision wasn't overturned) the other night before rain abandoned the game v the Sixers was not surprising.
It wasn't an LB decision it was a caught behind off the thigh pad. Bloody good thing it was overturned too. Especially seeing as the same ump had gunned Smith out a few balls earlier with one going way over the top and failed to notice Moi Moi hitting the cover off it on the way to the keeper.
... but the point still stands reasonably solid. If Gayle or Warner don't score big the Thunder are more of a silent fart. Would have liked to see what Uzi could have done with more overs on Sunday though.
Hmmm. Based on the two conflicting responses I have just received it sounds like it shouldn't have been reversed. It's a bummer because 90% of the crowd just want to see Gayle.