- Messages
- 65,819
I lol at the dopes who didn't bother to turn up at the AGM whinging about the dopes who did..
I suppose democracy is only valued when it suits us..
I suppose democracy is only valued when it suits us..
I lol at the dopes who didn't bother to turn up at the AGM whinging about the dopes who did..
I suppose democracy is only valued when it suits us..
I lol at the dopes who didn't bother to turn up at the AGM whinging about the dopes who did..
I suppose democracy is only valued when it suits us..
Stagger and Jodeci, i gather the resolutions were mainly turned down due to the wording and that they may have even been illegal ones and not the actually meaning of the resolutions. I gather most people for for the 3 years term, code of conduct and independent board member but due the wording voted against it.
Is that a fair assumption?
thats what i thought.Spot on.
Dennis even mentioned that he would take legal action and it was unlawful.
thats what i thought.
So why weren't they written up by lawyers?
Seems very unprofessional.
There must be lawyers that specialize in these sorts of things, we use specialized strata lawyers as they know the laws back to front and know the wording to make things bullet proof. You would think the club could find a lawyer with the expertise to do similar relating to the registered clubs act.
Someone stuffed up me thinks.
And of coarse Dennis is going to know the laws he was running a registered club for 30years. Why wouldn't the board seek Chris Jurd to write motions? he has the experience and expertise?
besides Casper and Jake who on here us trying to discredit Moss????Got to laugh at all the geniuses in here attempting to discredit Bill Moss.
We definitely have the dumbest fans of any club.
Stagger and Jodeci, i gather the resolutions were mainly turned down due to the wording and that they may have even been illegal ones and not the actually meaning of the resolutions. I gather most people for for the 3 years term, code of conduct and independent board member but due the wording voted against it.
Is that a fair assumption?
"The sporting colours of the club are to be royal blue and gold"
to be
"The sporting colours of the club are to be Pantone 19-3955 TCX Royal Blue and
Pantone 15-1062 TCX Gold Fusion"
As far as I remember the last time we wanted to change a constitutional point (I think that was to allow directors over the age of 75 to contuinue as directors) the text of the current part of the consitution needs to be presented and then the new wording of the constitution be presented. Somthing like.
Motion, that Point 1.5 of the constiution be ammended from
"The sporting colours of the club are to be royal blue and gold"
to be
"The sporting colours of the club are to be Pantone 19-3955 TCX Royal Blue and
Pantone 15-1062 TCX Gold Fusion"
If that was how the changes were submitted, that would help. It would also help if the adding of the code of conduct would also have had ramifications for not abiding by it, but my guess is that would be taken under a different part of the constitution (disciplinary matters).
Carn the Pantone TCX's !!