Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

[Shorty]

You have to wonder about a person who hears a scuffle, and their first reaction is to start taping it.

Are you for real?
Brett Stewart is outside your yard having a scuffle with your neighbour?:?

Geez some of you are extremely naive.
People record everything everywhere, this isn't sus in the least.

People need to stop viewing and judging the case as a League or Manly fan.
It's obvious people cloud their judgment.

 

[bartman]

or if he was druk enough to say something incriminating

Oh, I hadn't thought of that...

 

[gong_eagle]

or if he was druk enough to say something incriminating

both good points too,that's if he turned the sound on

 

[Sleep]

I thought webcams were just for girls to strip on and then have the guy upload it to some website for the world to see. I've gotta get with the times.

 

[Pass the Ball]

As soon as a fight breaks out anywhere these days, people whip out their mobile phones and start filming Tarantino style...

If it is a semi-celebrity then it would be a certainty..

But surely even boofhead footballers must know this...

 

[Kiki]

I thought webcams were just for girls to strip on and then have the guy upload it to some website for the world to see. I've gotta get with the times.

hahahahah me too!

 

[Sleep]

For the record it wasn't me who uploaded our "conversations" I swear! :sarcasm:

 

[gaterooze]

both good points too,that's if he turned the sound on

Looking at it from the other side, the video could conceivably also be helpful to Stewart's defence. The police have to check all angles, and they apparently didn't get the video until after charging Stewart, it seems?

Either way, I hope the guy made a copy of it that will "leak" out

 

[The BigFella]

I would be interested to see if BARTMAN felt so pasionately about the guilt of the accused, and the despiceable decision to allow him to play if we were talking about Nathan Hindmarsh and Paramatta?

 

[Eels Dude]

I would be interested to see if BARTMAN felt so pasionately about the guilt of the accused, and the despiceable decision to allow him to play if we were talking about Nathan Hindmarsh and Paramatta?

If you read Bartman's posts I really don't think he's talking 'guilt' as such at all, and probably would be even more disappointed and angry if it were Nathan Hindmarsh.

 

[StormChaser]

Bartman is probably the ONLY sane member of this forum......apart from myself of course *cough* and he's also unbiased and fair unlike the majority on here.

 

[typicalfan]

Because Bartman can see the bigger picture, he knows its the right outcome for the game and a step in the right direction.

 

[bartman]

I would be interested to see if BARTMAN felt so pasionately about the guilt of the accused, and the despiceable decision to allow him to play if we were talking about Nathan Hindmarsh and Paramatta?

Mate, I've already said in this thread that I absolutely would feel the same if an Eels player was in Stewart's situation. Probably even more passionately because he's a player in my team?

But I'm not convinced of or advocating Stewart's guilt... that's for the courts to decide, not us. But the NRL taking action and standing him down is a separate issue to anyone's guilt or innocence. Stewart is still on full pay - like Bird was last year - and perfectly entitled to be so while this is all resolved.

 

[CharlieF]

Bartman is probably the ONLY sane member of this forum......apart from myself of course *cough* and he's also unbiased and fair unlike the majority on here.

Bartman has an opinion on this case which he has expressed.

 

[The Dodger]

supposedly dna tests came back negative

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/nrl/story/0,27074,25176491-14823,00.html

 

[bartman]

Well there you go...

If that happens to lead to the charges being dropped or not proven, then the NRL have still done the right thing in standing a player down while charges are being resolved. Sending a messages to players and their clubs that from 2009 league is not going to take things they way they have been any more.

 

[Rockin Ronny]

Are you for real?
People need to stop viewing and judging the case as a Manly fan.

Good advice.
Seeing as the average Manly man has an IQ of 3, it would be better that Manly fans don;t take a view on anything.

 

[bartman]

Bartman has an opinion on this case which he has expressed.

It's actually an opinion on the NRL's action. Not the case... it's not about innocence or guilt until teh court decides ;-)

 

[sneagle]

supposedly dna tests came back negative

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/nrl/story/0,27074,25176491-14823,00.html

Too early for me to be relieved I guess, but I am a little bit...

So what does that now mean?:shock:

 

[Mr Angry]

Bartman is probably the ONLY sane member of this forum......apart from myself of course *cough* and he's also unbiased and fair unlike the majority on here.

Oi!!