What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brisbane Broncos withdraw their offer to sign Melbourne Storm star Greg inglis

Stagger eel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
65,635
Colin Best surely will be a big loss for the rabbits and even bigger gain for the Sharks , its a pitty we didnt make a play for him a centre wing combo of Walker and Best would have been amazing

as opposed to Elford and Simmons which would of been spine tingaling...
 

boxhead

First Grade
Messages
5,958
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...star-greg-inglis/story-e6frg7mf-1225950355262

South Sydney is yet to clinch a deal with unsigned superstar Greg Inglis

Stuart Honeysett
From: The Australian
November 10, 2010 12:00AM

SOUTH Sydney is adamant there are still a few hurdles before Greg Inglis is over the line at Redfern.

Souths are scheduled to meet Inglis and his manager this week to make a formal offer and remain optimistic about the star centre wearing red and green next season.


However, Rabbitohs chief executive Shane Richardson yesterday ruled out the club paying any part of Inglis's legal bill, one of the triggers for his deal with the Broncos falling apart.


"I can tell you now we won't be paying the bill because if we did pay the bill it would be cap-able," Richardson said.


"I'd like to think he will be joining us but there's no guarantees. I know he loves the game and we're in with a chance. We'll find out in the next couple of days how good a chance. But if this does drag on too long I've got no doubt Greg will go to rugby union or AFL or somewhere else.."


Inglis has been at odds with Melbourne over a $117,000 legal bill stemming from his successful defence against assault charges involving fiancee Sally Robinson last year. The Storm hired a QC to defend Inglis, with the club's own image also at stake.


Inglis is happy to pay $87,000 of the bill but isn't pleased about getting stuck with the full amount, given he had no say in who was hired. The NRL has already indicated any club that pays a portion of Inglis's legal bill will have to include it in next year's cap.


"The situation with the legal bill and Melbourne is a simple one," Richardson said.


"He's not saying he's going to pay the legal bill himself _ what he's saying is he queries the bill.


"You query bills every day of your life whether it be electricity bills or legal bills. That's something his manager and his lawyer is working through with Melbourne."


Brisbane chief executive Bruno Cullen wouldn't comment yesterday but a source close to the club said the deal had fallen away following the involvement of Russell Crowe and Anthony Mundine.


Inglis has said he was ready to join another code until Crowe intervened and asked him to join the Rabbitohs.


"The legal bills had absolutely nothing to do with it," a Brisbane source said. "The legal bills would have been sorted out. Everyone is carrying on about the legal bills but there's no way Inglis wasn't going to be playing rugby league somewhere next year.


"Common sense would have prevailed but somewhere in the last couple of weeks Mundine and Crowe have got involved and talked him out of signing."


The Broncos' situation wasn't helped by an impasse over changes to playing contracts which was a legacy of the Storm's salary cap scandal this season.


The NRL was keen for new guidelines to be introduced where managers and players would have to sign statutory declarations confirming the contract was salary cap compliant.


However, both the players' union and agents' association baulked at the proposal and the contracts of several players including Inglis were left in limbo until a solution could be reached.


Richardson said he was confident the situation wouldn't lead to bad blood between the two clubs.


"People underestimate what we do in the indigenous community with our employment programs and Souths Cares and all sorts of things," Richardson said.


"Things went on for a long while with the legal situation with Melbourne and maybe he had second thoughts about it."

This could very well mean Inglis will not sign with Souths.....if so it's bye-bye to Inglis, unless we make an extremely serious offer.
 
Messages
12,162
I hope we don't.
There are many, many NRL players who I would be sorry to lose from the game of Rugby League.
Inglis isn't one of them.
He is a douche bag of the highest order.

Suity
just call him $cummy bill junior i cant believe any club would touch him with a 40 foot barge pole now he has mundine in his ear we all saw how his 'advice' to sonny bill worked out didnt we
 

The Colonel

Immortal
Messages
41,833
The release of Inglis to the Broncos was based on compassionate grounds because his partner had taken a job in Brisbane. Last time I looked Redfern was still only halfway to Brisbane from Melbourne....... Melbourne still need to release a player to come in under the cap for next year but I wonder if they will release Inglis now it is no longer because of compassionate reasons?
 

Avenger

Immortal
Messages
33,331
The release of Inglis to the Broncos was based on compassionate grounds because his partner had taken a job in Brisbane. Last time I looked Redfern was still only halfway to Brisbane from Melbourne....... Melbourne still need to release a player to come in under the cap for next year but I wonder if they will release Inglis now it is no longer because of compassionate reasons?
Compassionate grounds my arse. He was released to the Broncos because of the News Limited/Super League connection. The Storm would be pissed he has gone to a club that News wanted out of the game. Same reason why Cronk wasn't released to us.
 

Maroubra Eel

Coach
Messages
19,044
The release of Inglis to the Broncos was based on compassionate grounds because his partner had taken a job in Brisbane. Last time I looked Redfern was still only halfway to Brisbane from Melbourne....... Melbourne still need to release a player to come in under the cap for next year but I wonder if they will release Inglis now it is no longer because of compassionate reasons?

I agree. But you don't think he's already a done deal at Souths?
 

dazeely

First Grade
Messages
6,682
Isn't it still up to the storm as to whether he will be released. Where's the afl when you need them. As good as he is the game doesn't need scum like him. Sonny bill the second.
 

mickdo

Coach
Messages
17,355
Well they have to release somebody. They won't magically get under the cap you know. Or will they??? :lol:
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,882
i'm sure the storm will be happy to see the back of mundine's latest toy boy no matter what club he goes to
 

bartman

Immortal
Messages
41,022
Did anyone click on Rothfield attempting to "face off" with Shane Richardson about the Inglis issue today?

Richo owned him from go to woe... I'm surprised Rothfield published it.
 

sarahk

Juniors
Messages
778
:lol: Slothfield got smashed.

It was such a funny article, absolutely made my day. One of Rotfields best i have to admit.

Why would a person even put up with a journalist ? Though i loved Richos part of ' i want you to put in the paper that we didnt know about the extra cap money until August' LOL.
 
Top