t-ba
Post Whore
- Messages
- 59,057
Why?hybrid_tiger said:Hope he gets the sack. Largely useless.
Willow said:Why?
Some people here need to work out the difference between a charge and a conviction.
Here's a hint: Being charged does not equal guilt.
Willow said:Why?
Some people here need to work out the difference between a charge and a conviction.
Here's a hint: Being charged does not equal guilt.
Danish said:He explained why.
He believes Gibbs is sh*t and hopes the club sacks him either way.
Can't blame him really.
bear56 said:I blame the Police,surely R.L. players are allowed to do whatever they like?
I have no probs with most of what you said.hybrid_tiger said:As above. Gibbs is a known trouble maker and this isn't the first alledged incident he's been involved in. I understand he's innocent until proven guilty, but you can't blame people for jumping to conclusions with his history.
I don't rate him at all (except for a few good games in 05), so I would like to see him gone.
Willow said:Why?
Some people here need to work out the difference between a charge and a conviction.
Here's a hint: Being charged does not equal guilt.
Willow said:I think hybrid can speak for himself Danish.
But thanks for your input.
Once again... any bloke deserves the presumption of innocence before posts on a forum think otherwise.
Cheers.
Willow said:I have no probs with most of what you said.
However you fell short with the 'but' disclaimer. People are not nessarily entitled to jump to those conclusions, despite your view to the contrary.
I don't give a screamer about his history.
Bottom line is that if you post a presumption of guilt, then we're compelled to crack down.
I'm sure you can work it out.
Cheers.
If people want him sacked over the assault charge, that's fine. Its opinion.meltiger said:Even if he was found guilty .... Seriously guys, its an assault charge.
People want him sacked over an assault charge? FMD, get off your high horses.
lol. Right.... delete everyone's posts because you can't keep your assumptions in check.hybrid_tiger said:Maybe you should delete this thread and let it not be discussed at all then, FFS.
Fact: Past incidents have nothing to do with the current incident.hybrid_tiger said:Fact: Gibbs is a known trouble maker and has been involved in incidents in the past, so it's only natural that people will jump to conclusions. It's human nature, despite you not thinking so.
aids said:Gibbs > raiders PL side