Bye Bye Latrell

[Valheru]

Nope is he challenges & loses it he’ll miss 2.

#throwmoreshitatlateral

Nope

120 if found guilty plus his 75 carry over is 195.

It will be challenged

 

[Alderley Rooster]

Yet Bromwich walks away scott free. the NRL is either serious or not.

I guess Latrell must be wondering how the one that he was a victim of that left him stretchered off the field goes unpunished

 

[Bazal]

Soft but not surprising

 

[Woody49]

Nope

120 if found guilty plus his 75 carry over is 195.

It will be challenged

Nope, incorrect.

 

[wibble]

Well spiffy.

In a tight game, we could have used a penalty there.

We lost the penalty count 10-5 and the bunker didn't deem us worthy of a penalty there, either.

But South's, who I rate our toughest match up, could get a huge boost if they get through to the prelim.

Win/win...

Love the little suspensions system. So fair for the team infringed upon.

 

[Valheru]

Nope, incorrect.

??

That's what the charge sheet says.

 

[Rabbits20]

He's been charged. Untwist your panties.

He will fight it though and probs get off.

 

[BunniesMan]

No Latrell no chance for Easts in 2 weeks time.

 

[Last Week]

"He will miss one match if he submits an early guilty plea or if he unsuccessfully challenges the charge at the judiciary."

Player Latrell Mitchell
Club Roosters
Minute of match 42nd
Charge/incident Dangerous Contact - Head/Neck
Charge grade 1
7yrs incident free discount? No
Base penalty 100
Penalty points: Early plea 90
Penalty points: Guilty plea 120
Prior Similar Offences in last 2 years (50% loading) 0

Prior Non-similar Offences in last 2 years (20% loading) 1
Carryover points to be added 75
Misconduct on whom? Josh Dugan

 

[Last Week]

See, reading that, to me it appears that because he's had a non similar offence in the last 2 years, 20% loading should be added. So;

Penalty points: Early plea 108
Penalty points: Guilty plea 144

Plus his 75 carry over points, they'd be silly to challenge it.

 

[Valheru]

See, reading that, to me it appears that because he's had a non similar offence in the last 2 years, 20% loading should be added. So;

Penalty points: Early plea 108
Penalty points: Guilty plea 144

Plus his 75 carry over points, they'd be silly to challenge it.

I think it is 120 for guilty plea as opposed to 100?

The club has said he will get 120 if they unsuccessfully challenge.

 

[Last Week]

I think it is 120 for guilty plea as opposed to 100?

The club has said he will get 120 if they unsuccessfully challenge.

Ah yes. I follow now. Then where does the loading come into it for a early plea?

 

[Valheru]

Ah yes. I follow now. Then where does the loading come into it for a early plea?

Early plea is 25% off so normally would be 75 but with his 20% loading he would get 90. 0.2 x 75 = 15

That's how i understand it anyways.

 

[Woody49]

S

??

That's what the charge sheet says.

Sorry, I stand corrected. I thought if he contested it he would go for 2.

Again sorry Val.

 

[Woody49]

I still love the fact that sharks supporters were throwing shit at the merkin...hilarious stuff

 

[Valheru]

S

Sorry, I stand corrected. I thought if he contested it he would go for 2.

Again sorry Val.

All good.

It is a bit confusing with all the loading.

 

[Woody49]

All good.

It is a bit confusing with all the loading.

A bit lol? Very confusing 99.9% of the time

 

[jargan83]

Josh Dugan should be suspended for an attempted Stone Cold Stunner

 

[Woody49]

Josh Dugan should be suspended for an attempted Stone Cold Stunner

Do you mean island cruisers?

 

[Saxon]

f**k me the Match Review Committee are inconsistent.
Three very similar dangerous tackles; one doesn't get cited, one is a grade 3 and one is a grade 1.

No wonder no-one has any respect for them.