bullsh*t.
All these pissant pseudo-psychological reasons for NOT including a CC Bears team.
No other sport in the world would treat one of its clubs and key regions the way the Bears and the central coast have been treated.
Rugby league is a sport that looks good on TV but it pays its players peanuts compared to global sports, its club memberships are a joke and it its global presence is next to zero - after 100+ years.
A sport like this needs to maximise its core areas - like the central coast - and it has to respect its origins (like the Bears). But the senseless, pathetic argument about "CC bears or not CC Bears" is dishonest and shows rugby league up as an amateur operation.
I have no confdence in the CC Bears being admitted because the decision makers are either incompetent or corrupt or both. I don't believe this will ever change.
Pissant psuedo- pyshological reasons that you never try to refute logically.
You just play the emotion card every time.
Unfortunately money makes the world go round.
Whether you like it or not, the NRL needs to maximise its earnings to keep their elite players, develop new players and promote the game against cashed up rivals....
Whilst I agree that the Bears/CC have been treated unfairly in the past, unfortunately if other expansion candidates bring in more money through TV rights for the overall betterment of the game, then I think that any new IC will elect to bring them into the comp in place of the Bears.
To do otherwise would be a breach of their professional duty...