East Coast Tiger
Coach
- Messages
- 14,139
He`s done it again. backflipped on QLD and has signed with the Blues
They'd still pick Pearce.
He`s done it again. backflipped on QLD and has signed with the Blues
prob right thereThey'd still pick Pearce.
Im willing to bet that the Titans will have better average results over the next 6 years than Manly do
Manly have now chewed up a heap of cap space, reportedly fractured the playing group and dont have all that much coming through the Jnrs. The Titans, while set back a bit, will have money to burn on better forwards and an up and coming half to partner an already good young talent
I honestly think they have dodged a bullet here
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, but firstly, how much cap space do you know has been chewed up in this re-signing? There are sizeable TPA's for sure.
As for the playing group being fractured, Brett Stewart is the last of the old boys group that had the vendetta against DCE. He will find it a lonely place if he wants to continue that agenda. It's a completely different playing group dynamic now.
And as for no good juniors coming through - rubbish.
If he was any good, you would have got him to back flip or never leave in the first place. Go back to my description of looking at it from Manly's perspective. Put on the CEO's or owners cap and tell me what you would do. If you don't get at the DCE back flip option, I'll be stunned. Sandow and Seizer are not the type of halves that you can build a club around.you and Danny Boy forget Sezer who we had to let go because we thought we were getting DCE. We DID let one go, we just decided it wasn't going to be LG. So it's kinda dumb to be making the 'you can't keep all halves' argument really.
As it is always, remember the Steve Turner thing? I remember being 'outraged' about that.:lol:
A few years from now this will just be a 'remember when' story, no one will give two shits beyond that.
The NYC being mid table at best and the NSWCup side being the bottom of the NRL backed clubs shows that depth and jnr base will be a problem
Mostly just the Stewarts, and Watmong.im a little late to the party but hasnt there been a bit of tension between dce and other manly players
If he was any good, you would have got him to back flip or never leave in the first place. Go back to my description of looking at it from Manly's perspective. Put on the CEO's or owners cap and tell me what you would do. If you don't get at the DCE back flip option, I'll be stunned. Sandow and Seizer are not the type of halves that you can build a club around.
If, and we really don't know the whole bloody deal, Manly have paid overs, he adds a lot to the club through media exposure, crowds, memberships, one club, representative etc. Do you think Sandow or Seizer would provide any of that on top of the on field. Could either captain? There is so much more to a marque signing and you were planning to tap into that with DCE. That is why your club was singing so loudly what a huge signing you had performed. You simply didn't have him completely locked in just because he signed. And you should have known that from all the previous examples over the years.
'I am committed to honoring my contract at the GC Titans in 2016", like, a week earlier before he resigned with Manly? Huh? Bullshit.
Actually all the media speculation was around the fact he DIDN'T come out and say that. The Titans staff were saying they believed he would but DCE never said he was committed, he said that Manly still had the opportunity to try and keep him.
He handled himself disgracefully.
http://www.triplem.com.au/brisbane/...y-cherry-evans-signing-with-manly-sea-eagles/
?He had told us that he was committed to the club that nothing had changed and that he didn?t expect anything to change, so there was no point being paranoid and ringing him every five minutes to check whether that was still the case," he said.
He handled himself disgracefully.
http://www.triplem.com.au/brisbane/...y-cherry-evans-signing-with-manly-sea-eagles/
?He had told us that he was committed to the club that nothing had changed and that he didn?t expect anything to change, so there was no point being paranoid and ringing him every five minutes to check whether that was still the case," he said.
Regardless of whether you feel he handled himself disgracefully, I was responding to a point that was made and the fact remains that DCE very clearly did not make comment that committed himself one way or another. In fact, that is the very reason you believe he handled himself disgracefully.