In the last dozen years, Hasler has coached teams to 5 grand finals and 2 premierships. With 10 consecutive finals appearances.
So, missing the finals twice makes him a worse coach than Sticky?
Fair points. Rankings like this will always be very debatable. If you'd asked me 2 years ago I'd have Des as a top 4 coach.
More than simply missing the finals, the way he has trashed the Dogs roster for what could still be years has soured my opinion on him. Furthermore, he isn't missing the finals with a poor roster that he inherited, he was heading down the ladder year on year with a team that he built from scratch, which was in a Grand Final not very long ago. Every recruitment decision and every football decision he has made since 2014 has resulted in dropping a few ladder spots. This looks to me like a coach that has lost his touch. There's every chance he can turn it around at Manly but right now, his stocks are low.
Sticky is always controversial. I think middling is a pretty fair assessment. He's got the Raiders into a competitive outfit which is an improvement on where they were under Furner's long reign.
The main difference between Des and Sticky is that Sticky is heading in the right direction (albeit slowly) while Des has been heading in the wrong direction since Grand Final day 2014.