- Messages
- 7,178
That's their right, I'm not telling the AMNRL clubs what to do or how to run their league, they can do whatever they want, it's their league after all. The problem though comes when they are purposely impeding the growth of the sport and making things difficult for people who do want to do the right thing. If the AMNRL don't want to develop the sport and put in the work required to be the national governing body then they need to step aside and give the reigns to someone who does. As far as I can tell, the only thing stopping this from happening right now would be that a couple of AMNRL guys want to feel like they have power and are too proud to do the right thing. Otherwise, they could quite easily hand over their NGB status and then go on happily running their league however they want.I agree that the amnrl's tomahawks selection criteria is a shambles. The NY knights telling s johnson to piss off.
But you must understand for teams in the amnrl, not the actual amnrl executive, must feel like at the end of the day RL is amateur in the US. Constitutions, marketing plans, flash websites etc mean very little.
To clubs like those in the usarl they mean a lot. They are trying to run the sport and their clubs like a business.
But to amnrl clubs, do they actually want what assets the usarl has? Can they be bothered? Do they just want to run an amateur club like a muck around game of touch footy down the local park?
If RL wants to get serious in the USA it needs the usarl approach.
But i'd say for a lot of amnrl clubs that because they cant see the intangible assets, they're not really interested. They feel like they have stronger teams on the park vs usarl's strength off it.
Last edited: