What does that have to do with anything I've posted? Where am I saying we should have no morals? I just don't want the state involved in what people say.
It's hilarious, the only weapon you and people like you have in arguments is to falsify the claims of your opponents. So "we should have constitutionally enshrined free speech" gets mischaracterized into "I'm a bigot who thinks Izzy is doing the work of the lord". No capacity for nuance, no interest in arguing in good faith, just a commitment to lying in order to make my opponents look as awful as possible for internet points.
Incredibly, this is precisely what you've done throughout this discussion. Projection is a wonderful thing.
No. My definition is not getting the government involved in enforcing it. You know, with the laws that Israel could be prosecuted under?
That's not really a definition, but that aside, no government is enforcing anything?
You seem to have made up some imagined "state action" in the last few pages when nobody has said anything about Folau being criminally or civilly punished for his posts. I can't see anywhere in this thread where anybody who is arguing with you has supported this.
The only time legal enforcement popped up in this thread was when you provided a link to an obscure instance that occured overseas and was reported in an alternative newspaper in Canada.