Chipmunk
Coach
- Messages
- 16,959
We haven't been through this at all. Your if-then statement is a non sequitur.
I've moved on and don't care.It depends who the best player is. Would you sack a coach to keep Jarryd Hayne happy?
We haven't been through this at all. Your if-then statement is a non sequitur.
I've moved on and don't care.It depends who the best player is. Would you sack a coach to keep Jarryd Hayne happy?
You think your logic makes your opinions more authoritative... while others see the flaws in your logic and selective evidence.They're more authoritative anyway, because I show my evidence and logic.
I don't have a side of the debate... I'm here to just point out nonsense and educate merkins like you.Meanwhile there are merkins on your side of the debate who think that the result of a single game proves whatever point they're trying to make.
I know.I don't mind cats.
Evidence is by definition selective.You think your logic makes your opinions more authoritative... while others see the flaws in your logic and selective evidence.
It's a tired old shtick, just saying something is circular logic. Most of you don't even know what it means.I don't have a side of the debate... I'm here to just point out nonsense and educate merkins like you.
*ClearyIf you have to sack a coach to keep your best player, then clearly he is no longer the best person to be coaching your team.
Occam's Razor is two words FFS!Is Occam's Razor your buzzword of this week?
Yes, and hence subjective too.Evidence is by definition selective.
Another tired old shtick is saying that your circular logics posts are somehow to educate us merkins...It's a tired old shtick, just saying something is circular logic. Most of you don't even know what it means.
"...if he is to commit long term future"![]()
Brad Arthur bemoans Leeds’ familiar failings despite glimmers of hope
New coach will want to see quick improvements after defeat to Hull KR if he is to commit long-term futurewww.google.com
And because 's means is, it's actually three wordsOccam's Razor is two words FFS!
That's why we're here ffsYes, and hence subjective too.
Most of you are unteachable. Footy fans lack the fundamental understanding of probability required to understand what is evidence and what isn't. My work here is for the few.Another tired old shtick is saying that your circular logics posts are somehow to educate us merkins...
![]()
Run Leeds run"...if he is to commit long term future". They're talking up Arthur's 10 game cameo like it's a trial for him to see if he wants to take them on, rather than the other way around!
Who the f**k is Lachie Miller? Dude appeared in the NRL at the age of 28, played 19 NRL games, and now taking up an import spot at Leeds. Are English players really that bad?![]()
Brad Arthur bemoans Leeds’ familiar failings despite glimmers of hope
New coach will want to see quick improvements after defeat to Hull KR if he is to commit long-term futurewww.google.com
Can your "work" here then be restricted to the just one dedicated thread, you know, for the few...That's why we're here ffs
Most of you are unteachable. Footy fans lack the fundamental understanding of probability required to understand what is evidence and what isn't. My work here is for the few.
Quick improvements aren’t the coaches job.![]()
Brad Arthur bemoans Leeds’ familiar failings despite glimmers of hope
New coach will want to see quick improvements after defeat to Hull KR if he is to commit long-term futurewww.google.com
Quick improvements aren’t the coaches job.
Nothing is the coaches job according to some, I wonder if they afford Ryles the same leniency as they did for Bea Arthur??* Improvements aren't the coach's job, mirite?
A certain website won’t.Nothing is the coaches job according to some, I wonder if they afford Ryles the same leniency as they did for Bea Arthur??