Slackboy72
Coach
- Messages
- 12,116
If Melbourne loses the title who gets it? Parra or nobody?
And does Manly have two titles on the trot now?
And does Manly have two titles on the trot now?
Yes i agree , i was just making a point that the eels werent the only onesGaba, because they didn't win it. The Storm knocked out multiple teams in the finals, robbed each of the equally a chance to win the competition.
There is an awesome point on facebook relating to the news story - How fantastic does our 40 - 0 victory look now? Goes to show money can't always buy a premiership
We should get the 2009 premiership. If they were docked points then, we finish 8th. We have a 100% record in finals series, so we continue that and win the comp.
We should get the 2009 premiership. If they were docked points then, we finish 8th. We have a 100% record in finals series, so we continue that and win the comp.
Seems a lot of people on radio etc are saying Manly and Parra should be awarded those premierships. It's a silly argument though as every team knocked out in the semis was equally robbed. Technically even teams knocked out in '06 and '08 were robbed as they were prevented a chance at contesting a grand final against Brisbane and Manly.
Yes i agree , i was just making a point that the eels werent the only ones
the whole final series could have ended differently
just goes to show 'a lot' people are unable to logically analyse and think things through. the premierships in those seasons didnt just hinge on the one game in october. every loss melbourne inflicted on any team in those seasons affected the course of that team's season.
manly and parra were simply lucky that their course to the GFs werent affected. it shouldnt be rewarded with a premiership.