ok f*ckwits. This year the Storm will not win any points, but teams have to beat them to get theirs. Guess what - the storm will still field a salary cp smashing team. So no side who played them in the premiership rounds can claim a "what if". So no game from last year has it's result altered - except the GF, which has.
The "what if" argument askes "what if" the Storm were nder the cap. Clearly, results would be altered -notably te 2007 preliminary final, and the 2006 fourth qualifying final. But it's not a "what if" argument. It's simply an argument about a particular result tat has now been scrubbed. The choice simply is this - do we have a result for our GF - or a non event?
A nil result means you deny the season existed.
Parra are reigning premiers. End of story.
A nil result means you deny the season existed.
Parra are reigning premiers. End of story.
(As pointed out by some dude on the radio)
Parra wouldn't have made the finals last year if the Bulldogs two stripped points for an extra player had been awarded to Penrith, so I don't see how Parra deserve it.
And Manly should definately have the 2007 GF added.
The thing about this is I'm worried half the comp is over the cap. Let's face it it wouldn't be hard to do.
ok f*ckwits. This year the Storm will not win any points, but teams have to beat them to get theirs. Guess what - the storm will still field a salary cp smashing team. So no side who played them in the premiership rounds can claim a "what if". So no game from last year has it's result altered - except the GF, which has.
The "what if" argument askes "what if" the Storm were nder the cap. Clearly, results would be altered -notably te 2007 preliminary final, and the 2006 fourth qualifying final. But it's not a "what if" argument. It's simply an argument about a particular result tat has now been scrubbed. The choice simply is this - do we have a result for our GF - or a non event?
A nil result means you deny the season existed.
Parra are reigning premiers. End of story.
Erm ... no you don't ... the only reason you got to the Grand Final, arguably, is that you played St George / Gold Coast / Canterbury to get there .. if you had played Melbourne in Week 1, you might have been eliminated then and it's all done and dusted.So now it's a Parra bashing thread ffs!
Parra did everything asked of it, including beating the top 3 sides. Same with manly in 07. We both made it. Melbourne are being tripped the premierships, not their competition points. We f*cking deserve it.
When an Olympic gold medal is stripped, the gold is immediately awarded to the one who came second.
Right now 2007 and 2009 mean nothing. Recognise who wre the clubs that legitimately passed the hoops that no one else could legitimately.
Congrats Manly on winning 8 premierships. Eels fans now know that we have won 5.
they would have beaten Parramatta by 50 .. we'll never know.
No, I don't think they would have .... but they were denied the fair right to try and do so ... that said, Parra didn't have a halfback either (lol).You reckon Brisbane wouldve won without a halfback.:lol:
(As pointed out by some dude on the radio)
Parra wouldn't have made the finals last year if the Bulldogs two stripped points for an extra player had been awarded to Penrith, so I don't see how Parra deserve it.
And Manly should definately have the 2007 GF added.
The thing about this is I'm worried half the comp is over the cap. Let's face it it wouldn't be hard to do.
No way should Manly and Parra get the premierships for every reason stated so far in this thread.
Nothing compares to watching your team loose a GF, sucks to know the team that beat us cheated. 07 and 09 are now stains on the game, the record books will reflect this as they should..... Makes '06 and '08 super efforts