^ Because its either the Storm or some other club that News corp has a vested interest in and makes no money out of belittling them like they do the Dragons.
Sure, St George copped some stick last year, and some of it was justified. But the lengths Merkinfield and his cronies went to attacking the club showed an agenda to sell papers by stiring up Dragons fans and jelousy/hatred from other clubs.
Hell, the paper is run by Bulldogs and Sharks fans, two camps that have no love for the red V.
Eg, remember the Masons locked out of Round 26? They had NRL passes which clearly say not valid for sold out matches. Ok, buy a ticket if you want to go that badly. BUT, no one in that family was going to do that when none of them went for the dragons...
The telly had to dress them up for a photo shoot (and one bloke was wearing a chicks jersey). Typical News Corp trying to fabricate a story to stir people up to sell advertising (they don't sell news).
They do the same thing with politics... Ooh the evil boat people terrorists are comming to get you, but think of their children! Or are they? Discuss with our expert. Opinionated article followed by a blog full of vicious angry opinionated Biggots and fairies arguing both cases, meanwhile uncle rupert laughs all the way to the bank.
Just don't read or visit their websites and you will be fine. (Daily Telegraph, Courier Mail, Herald Sun, The Australian et cetera). Hopefully now that the commission looks like its going ahead, we won't have to put up with their hands all over the ownership of the game.