I comprehend just fine you made a mistake in calling my maths incorrect.Because so far you’ve pulled a few different stats out of your bum to try and prove relevance, unfortunately none of which have been able to do so..
If you’re going to try and argue with independent, statistically relevant fact, you’ll need to come up with a better explanation.
Or can’t you comprehend that?
I also comprehend that you want me to explain something you are accusing me of saying when in fact I never said it all.
I also comprehend that you will go to any length to change the direction of the posts in an effort to not admit the errrors you make.