emjaycee
Coach
- Messages
- 14,345
This is a genuine question which might not go well on here, but here goes.
A lot of posters are ripping into our attack which I agree can always improve, however I am seriously wondering how different it actually is to the "top" teams in regards to how it is planned, not how it is executed.
When I look at the tries scored by the top 3 team last round, I see nothing different in "how" they are attacking, they just seem to be able to execute it better. They have more players pushing up in support, their individual passes stick more or are better directed, their players might be faster, the first player breaks the defensive line more, and they seem to execute at a faster pace. But the "shape", the "shifts", and the plan seems to me exactly the same as what we attempt to execute.
If this is the case, is it not then simply an issue with regard to our players and their individual skill and effort levels? Their ability to actually execute the play? Even the Dogs have a similar style of attack to the top 3, they just fail to execute well.
Spend the 12 minutes and have a look at these three highlights from last week's games. Tell me where there is something different from what we try and do that results in a try. Something that can be fixed by improved coaching that ISN'T related to the effort or skill of an individual player.
www.nrl.com
www.nrl.com
www.nrl.com
As I said, this is a genuine question because I must be missing something as all I really see different is our players inability to execute at times (and when we do execute well, we score).
A lot of posters are ripping into our attack which I agree can always improve, however I am seriously wondering how different it actually is to the "top" teams in regards to how it is planned, not how it is executed.
When I look at the tries scored by the top 3 team last round, I see nothing different in "how" they are attacking, they just seem to be able to execute it better. They have more players pushing up in support, their individual passes stick more or are better directed, their players might be faster, the first player breaks the defensive line more, and they seem to execute at a faster pace. But the "shape", the "shifts", and the plan seems to me exactly the same as what we attempt to execute.
If this is the case, is it not then simply an issue with regard to our players and their individual skill and effort levels? Their ability to actually execute the play? Even the Dogs have a similar style of attack to the top 3, they just fail to execute well.
Spend the 12 minutes and have a look at these three highlights from last week's games. Tell me where there is something different from what we try and do that results in a try. Something that can be fixed by improved coaching that ISN'T related to the effort or skill of an individual player.
Match Highlights: Storm v Knights
The Storm and Knights face off during Round 18 of the 2021 NRL Telstra Premiership

Match Highlights: Rabbitohs v Bulldogs
The Rabbitohs and Bulldogs face off during Round 18 of the 2021 NRL Telstra Premiership

Match Highlights: Warriors v Panthers
The Warriors and Panthers face off in Round 18 of the 2021 NRL Telstra Premiership

As I said, this is a genuine question because I must be missing something as all I really see different is our players inability to execute at times (and when we do execute well, we score).