Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 91,119
It's not f**ken hard!If the issue was done and dusted we wouldn't be talking about it FFS.
It's not f**ken hard!If the issue was done and dusted we wouldn't be talking about it FFS.
He's approaching proper peanut status.
For Matterson it is.It's never too late to change a shit policy.
You're done and dusted!Just because we talk about something doesn’t mean it’s not done and dusted FFS.
The ball was in the NRL's court. Now everyone misses out except Matterson. He keeps his $4k and reduces his risk of injury.For Matterson it is.
Yea and the NRL considered the matter over the moment Matterson decided to keep his money and sit out.The ball was in the NRL's court. Now everyone misses out except Matterson. He keeps his $4k and reduces his risk of injury.
If only the NRL actually had soup nazi powers.Yea and the NRL considered the matter over the moment Matterson decided to keep his money and sit out.
Which is why every sane person - and hopefully many of his teammates - called Matterson's original response out for being utterly selfish, and devoid of any commitment to the team/club.The ball was in the NRL's court. Now everyone misses out except Matterson. He keeps his $4k and reduces his risk of injury.
No point applying to change something once you've had your one and only shot / choice.If it was finished he wouldn’t have applied to change it.
It's never too late to change a shit policy.
Yeah why should the NRL give a crap ? What is the dangerous precedent that it might have been set by allowing the player to opt for fine over suspension ?What’s rightful about it? If it’s his call why shouldn’t he be able to change his mind before the punishment is to occur?
Do you think it’s not?If the last 3 pages of this thread have taught me anything its that the issue is done and dusted FFS!
What? They did allow the player to opt for a fine over suspension. He just chose the suspension.Yeah why should the NRL give a crap ? What is the dangerous precedent that it might have been set by allowing the player to opt for fine over suspension ?
It’s done and dusted as far as the NRL is concerned, just like Matto’s credibility.Do you think it’s not?
Who’s gloating you dribbler?? Most of us at the time said it was a f**king selfish decision that wasn’t going to be popular with team mates and fans alike. Remember you as usual tried to find yet another excuse for his shit behaviour. Tried to tell us maybe he was injured or playing for someone in the WC lol.Yeah why should the NRL give a crap ? What is the dangerous precedent that it might have been set by allowing the player to opt for fine over suspension ?
I also don’t get the gloating by some supporters who were seemingly willing the NRL to stick to their guns, to the detriment of their own club.
That was a Brett Kenny dip and swerve right there. Why shouldn’t a player have a larger window to make his decision? What dangerous precedent would it set ?What? They did allow the player to opt for a fine over suspension. He just chose the suspension.