What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Eels Salary Cap MK II

How many pages in 24 hrs

  • 1-15

    Votes: 5 38.5%
  • 16-30

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • 31-45

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 45+

    Votes: 6 46.2%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
62,867
:lol: This post looks suspiciously like one of Caspers. Mods can you please check this moron's IP address? :lol:



I hit a nerve didn't I. It is ok one of the first steps is awareness.


It might be a year or it might be two but one day you will sit back and go gee I realy was a hate spreading dickhead and now I have erased my ego I feel so much better.
 

strider

Post Whore
Messages
78,987
Well, maybe not quite the biggest in history....

But, the point is that it is not a breach of the cap in itself. You reckon none of our former Chairs or their associates have been involved in real estate deals with our players?

Dont we get nailed to a cross over each of them?
 

Lethal

Juniors
Messages
372
I hit a nerve didn't I. It is ok one of the first steps is awareness.


It might be a year or it might be two but one day you will sit back and go gee I realy was a hate spreading dickhead and now I have erased my ego I feel so much better.

LOL yes you really hit a nerve gussy :lol::lol::lol:
 

El Diablo

Post Whore
Messages
94,107
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...r-nrl-salary-cap-verdict-20160430-goj5fg.html

Parramatta Eels fear takeover bid after NRL salary cap verdict

Date
May 1, 2016 - 10:00PM

Chris Barrett
Sports Writer

The scene has been set for what shapes as one of the most turbulent weeks in Parramatta's history, with the Eels claiming that plotters are awaiting the release of the NRL's salary cap findings to "come out of the long grass and do the privatisation deed".

On Tuesday the NRL is expected to announce the outcome of the Integrity Unit's investigation into Parramatta's third-party deals, a development that depending on the severity of any penalty determined by chief executive Todd Greenberg could cripple an otherwise promising season.

Parramatta chairman Steve Sharp declared on Sunday the club was ready to appeal sanctions in the courts, arguing they have not been afforded "natural justice and procedural fairness". Sources close to the board say they have already assembled a team of barristers ready to take on League Central.

As they await a breach notice directors are also readying to front members at Monday night's annual general meeting of Parramatta Leagues Club at which the board, which runs the Eels, will attempt to to fend off what they believe is a behind-the-scenes campaign to capitalise on the cap drama and privatise the NRL club.

"It's an ever-present concern," Sharp said. "Right now the proponents are hoping the salary cap investigation weakens the club so they can come out of the long grass and do the privatisation deed."

They won't utter his name publicly but members of the Eels hierarchy say they are wary of former Macquarie Bank executive Bill Moss, who told Fairfax Media last year he would "be happy to be part of a syndicate" to facilitate privatisation, believing it to be the only way forward for a club beset by internal politics and dysfunction in recent years.

It is unclear whether Moss retains a desire to be involved in changing the ownership structure of the Eels, and he did not return calls on Sunday.

However, the administration's fear about a takeover bid on the back of salary cap sanctions has led it to take a resolution to Monday's AGM that, if approved, would make the club a core property and give members more say in any attempt to sell it off.

That proposal needs a 50 per cent vote to pass, but if it does any future board would have to gain a 75 per cent majority of Leagues Club members' approval to offload part or all of the Eels. At present they can theoretically do so without consulting the membership base.

"We believe there is a campaign to privatise the Eels," Sharp said. "We are against that. Completely against it. The resolution sends this message as well as making any future attempts to privatise the Eels much more difficult. Such a decision needs to be made by the community not a board.

"Part of the current board's resilience comes from wanting to stop this agenda. There is a 'privatisation faction', it's no secret, but I believe that any ownership issues should be determined by our members."

Ironically, two years ago Sharp attempted to bring Moss onto the board as an independent director before the proposal was rejected by members at a typically heated AGM.

On Sunday, the chairman said the Eels' request to speak to Greenberg regarding their concerns about the cap investigation had not been met.

"It is the club's intention to analyse in detail any decision," Sharp told members in an email sent on Sunday afternoon. "We want to make sure that the investigation has treated our club fairly. We have asked and continue to ask for natural justice and procedural fairness.

"This means we are asking for a fair hearing. For allegations to be tested. That we have the chance to face our accusers. That if there are penalties then they are appropriate to the alleged breaches. These are the reasons why we sought assurances from the NRL that we will be allowed the chance to discuss our concerns about the investigation before any decisions were made. To date this has been denied.

"As a result our club also reserves all of our legal rights. Rights which we will assert if we believe we have not been treated fairly. We are prepared to fight through the courts if need be."

An NRL spokesman said the Eels had been given ample opportunity to provide any information to the investigation.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,708
The above article lists our concerns for a rogue privatization bid. As I understand it there is a motion tonight which quarantines the NRL franchise as a core asset and makes it harder for a merkin to launch a bid without a majority vote.

Interesting that Proshenks planted the seed yesterday (link a few pages back) suggesting that members will veto all motions tonight. Wishful thinking by the shit stirrers ?

A number of special and ordinary resolutions have been proposed for Monday's gathering, including proposed protections around the privatisation of the franchise. However, there is a feeling members will shoot down all of the resolutions in protest over the way the way the board and management have run the club.
 

phantom eel

First Grade
Messages
6,327
Merkins better not vote down the privatisation protection motion.

It's only by accepting the motion that members will get to have a say over the nature of any (future) privatisation... at present it seems the decision wouldn't have to go to a member vote?

Requiring 75% of members rather than 50% in favour of a particular privatisation bid is also a good saefty measure to ensure the "quality" of any private owner or consortium's bid, so that we - the Parramatta members - avoid a Newcastle/Tinkler type situation...

But just watch all of the Fitzy/Spags fanboys attending the AGM vote this one down because... um, we've been in the media a lot and... um, we maybe might lose a few competition points soon and... um, er, sack the board etc :crazy:
 
Messages
19,393
I dont know what to think. They are pretty much saying the nrl have said bugger all to them - but maybe they have at least said "you're f**ked" ???

Yeh, well I reckon at least part of Sharp's assertions reflected the fact that he's got an AGM in between now and the handing down of the breach notice.
 

Stagger eel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
65,786
pffft ... I see it as scare mongering tactic by a desperate chairman to divert attention away from the real issue, seemed to have worked for the sharpy fanboys...

it won't even get off the ground and nor should it.
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
153,770
pffft ... I see it as scare mongering tactic by a desperate chairman to divert attention away from the real issue, seemed to have worked for the sharpy fanboys...

it won't even get off the ground and nor should it.
Yep, for the members who didn't go to movie night.
 

Kornstar

Coach
Messages
15,578
Yep, for the members who didn't go to movie night.

Couldn't a large majority of members who go to the movie night not even be LC members? The movies was for members of the footy team not LC. Sure some may overlap but I guarantee a lot wouldn't as you are not necessarily a member of both the LC and the footy team.
 

Chipmunk

Coach
Messages
17,375
Plus it appears to be a copy and paste letter from the one he wrote before the NRL handed down the governance review findings

I'm not sure strict legal terminology like natural justice, procedural fairness, fair hearing, allegations to be tested, have the chance to face our accusers, etc has ever been used in a Statement from the club before.
 

Stagger eel

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
65,786
I'm not sure strict legal terminology like natural justice, procedural fairness, fair hearing, allegations to be tested, have the chance to face our accusers, etc has ever been used in a Statement from the club before.

yeah this one appears to be very strongly worded, then again we've never been in this situation before have we?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top