Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 91,282
If we do move Peats on, how different is it to us moving Pauli on earlier in the year.
Or Morgan. Merkins whinging about Peats' treatment are hypocrites.
If we do move Peats on, how different is it to us moving Pauli on earlier in the year.
I'm just thrilled, f**k you are a complete knobend, tell us all again how it's us fans and the members fault.
Tell us all it's the league's clubs fault, because it sells evil alcohol and has gambling.
Thus the reason we can't get any decent sponsors :lol: Doesn't seem to hurt the dogs who have probably the biggest Leagues club in Sydney.Nothing to do with the fact they don't have a plumber and used car salesman running the joint...............
But the point was - had the Storm been allowed to play in the Finals in 2010, how would you have felt?
Personally, I'd have felt the integrity of the competition was tarnished, and as unbiased as I am trying to be, I'd feel the same if we made the 8 this year.
After all, what better way to punish a club than to say they cannot win the Premiership?
More importantly - fans and officials of other clubs would not have been happy allowing Melbourne to be successful after cheating.
And I think we're in a similar boat - I strongly believe our season is dusted, regardless of shedding players.
Isn't Morgan on loan? More like he's gone off to get tutored than releasedOr Morgan. Merkins whinging about Peats' treatment are hypocrites.
So why do the Dogs get good boards while we don't? Whatever you think the answer is I will ask why. Eventually you'll have to admit the problem is our Leagues Club membership.
http://beta.smh.com.au/rugby-league...n-points-on-friday-night-20160510-gos01x.htmlParramatta Eels can make the top eight if they're playing for NRL competition points on Friday night
SHARE
FACEBOOK SHARE
TWITTER TWEET
MORE
Phil Gould May 10 2016 - 9:12PM
Phil Gould
Assuming that the Parramatta Eels are salary-cap compliant and playing for competition points by the time they take on South Sydney on Friday night, I honestly think they can still make a serious challenge for a top-eight position by the time September comes around. Most experts are saying they will have to win 12 of the remaining 15 games to make the play-offs. A 50per cent win ratio usually gets your team into the finals. However, when you consider that after nine rounds 10 NRL clubs have only won four matches, it wouldn't be all that surprising to see 11 wins as the cut-off point for 2016, provided you have a strong for-and-against differential. Look also at Parramatta's draw for the remaining 15 games. In order, they play South Sydney, Storm, Knights, Titans, South Sydney again, Sharks, Roosters, Panthers, Titans again, Tigers, Sea Eagles, Broncos, Raiders, Dragons and Warriors. How many games did you have them winning as you went through the list? Despite the fact they look like losing hooker Nathan Peats due to salary cap reasons, it is still a very strong Parramatta team and they are more than capable of beating every opposition they play between now and the end of the home-and-away season. I'm not writing off the Parramatta Eels at all.
.
Ok so question
With Choc, Morgs and possibly peats going who from outside the top 25 comes in? Obviously Toutai for Morgan, who else? Nelson and Cornish/King?
:lol:
The Jennings deal does look to be the one that put us in cap danger... We didn't really need him this year - so what if we lost Hoppa, we still had Morgs - and so should have let the Roosters rot in their troubles and signed up Jennings from the next year. We were just greedy, and incompentent .
So would you be happy if Peats turned around tomorrow and said he doesn't intend on going anywhere for the remainder of the season?
Yet the Dogs have the same type of Leagues Club membership ownership structure.
Unless your suggesting that one group of Leagues Club Members, is dramatically different than the group of Leagues Club members, 10 kms down the road?
Why do the nrl only take our points but not our for and against??
What if we scrape in the 8 by our f/a with a portion of that while we were cheating.
Its just so bloody stupid and i dont know if the nrl are any dopier than our board.
Im still very excited.
Results over the past three decades would support this assessment.
I thought the Jennings signing seemed excessive, but the fans were desperate for another world class outside back. Anyway I trust the coach to pick the players he wants.
So nevertheless..a League Club structure is not the issue then if the Dogs can be successful with the same structure.
I think to be balanced and fair, it would seem likely that Stuart got the go ahead (and any the necessary financial assurances etc) to embark on his cutting deadwood exercise from his mate Spags, at least one month in advance of announcing his conclusions to the squad via projector... which would also have been (naively) supported from there by a newly elected Sharp.
Both administrations/boards hold blame - the one where the seeds for all of this were sown (Osborne, Kearney, Stuart etc), and the one where the seeds bloomed (Seward etc).