Eels Team vs Bulldogs - Round 9.

[Casper The Ghost]

There was nothing wrong with his record - it was very very average. What got him sacked was the lack of progress behind the scenes.

 

[Casper The Ghost]

 

[Poupou Escobar]

A coach with a reasonably long history of Super League championships and NRL grand finals behind him is not good enough!

You say "Clearly it doesn't take as long to prove you can't do it as it does to prove you can". In contrast to Daniel Anderson's long trail of success over an 11 year period, where does this leave Kearney, a coach with less than a 22% win record (something like 7 wins out of 32 games) since he started coaching the Eels last year?

We're not talking about their current record; we're talking about preparing the club for long-term success - something we've not had since the 80s.

And '97-'02 doesn't count because we didn't win a premiership. That period was nothing but sustained, long-term disappointment.

Kearney's only been here for 18 months and our winning run could start this weekend. Either way the future looks bright. Just like it did in '86, '01, '05 and '09.

Have some faith. You don't really have any other choice you whiny merkin.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

is there any reason why he's not coaching another NRL club??...surely he would be at one by now if he was that good..

Apparently he's not in the mood. Maybe the stress is too much for him?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Across 11 years, why would a successful coach with a string of certified top grade achievements both in Super League & NRL behind him seek a contract extension? Do you think he was pissing in our pockets or just looking for a healthy retirement superfund? Since all the 3P shit started, here is a coach who has kept silent about all the goings on, minded his own business and has not back stabbed anyone nor said anything nasty about his favourite club of all, his childhood club.

I reckon he definitely had a plan. He was a first grade coach for f**k's sake. He's no more a f**king idiot than Kearney - these guys have been through the coaching ranks at multiple clubs and despite their lack of success neither of them deserves to have their knowledge questioned by the f**kwits on this board.

Anderson was sacked for interpersonal issues. If Kearney gets the arse it will be for the same reason.

 

[Casper The Ghost]

We're not talking about their current record; we're talking about preparing the club for long-term success - something we've not had since the 80s.

And '97-'02 doesn't count because we didn't win a premiership. That period was nothing but sustained, long-term disappointment.

Kearney's only been here for 18 months and our winning run could start this weekend. Either way the future looks bright. Just like it did in '86, '01, '05 and '09.

Have some faith. You don't really have any other choice you whiny merkin.

So you have all the inside knowledge about Daniel Anderson?
Were you there?

Then we have those directors who believed in the Glenn Duncan, Robert Sasson, Paul Osborne, etc, porkies about Daniel Anderson and went along with Daniel Anderson's execution, without hindrance. If these same directors had a HUGE BLIND SPOT back then, why would they not continue having the same huge blind spot today around Stephen Kearney? On behalf of the agenda you represent, and refuse to let go of, regardles of all the debunking evidence to the contrary, your present act has you show up like this kid Poo Poo http://youtu.be/6NvJs3KNdkw

 

[Poupou Escobar]

You don't know he didn't have a plan... It was mentioned on here from someone who had 'insider' contacts and somehow that has become gospel. DA had his version of the 'Academy', it just was't called that it was called the High Performance Unit or something along those lines. The thing with SK is we get this 'academy' talk like it's something groundbreaking he's come up with when it's something we've always had and something every club has in some shape or form.

How many of them brought Peter Nolan on board to recruit into the academy?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

So you have all the inside knowledge about Daniel Anderson?
Were you there?

I know as much as you do: that he was sacked by his employers and hasn't been employed in that role by any other club.

Given the board wanted a good coach, but didn't want him, and that other clubs have since needed a first grade coach, but for some reason he hasn't been picked up by any of them, the balance of probability says he's probably not as good a coach as you think he is.

That's not to say he's not an extremely smart coach; to end up coaching first grade despite never having played at that level is an incredible effort, and he can only have lasted as long as he did on his rugby league and managerial knowledge.

But in a world of globalised communications, knowledge is easy to get. Far more important is the ability to influence people, and I believe in the end that Anderson was found lacking in that area.

Just my opinion, but I am very intelligent and unlike you I try to be impartial. I'm one of the few people here to publicly admit I've been wrong, and I'm prepared to admit it in the future.

But mostly I avoid making definitive statements so I don't have to go through all that.

 

[Casper The Ghost]

I reckon he definitely had a plan. He was a first grade coach for f**k's sake. He's no more a f**king idiot than Kearney - these guys have been through the coaching ranks at multiple clubs and despite their lack of success neither of them deserves to have their knowledge questioned by the f**kwits on this board.

Anderson was sacked for interpersonal issues. If Kearney gets the arse it will be for the same reason.

Were you there?
Do you have the evidence?

I reckon he definitely had a plan. He was a first grade coach for f**k's sake. He's no more a f**king idiot than Kearney - these guys have been through the coaching ranks at multiple clubs and despite their lack of success neither of them deserves to have their knowledge questioned by the f**kwits on this board.

Yep, now you are putting Anderson and Kearney on to a level playing field (same shit basket case). This smearing/right off appears to be reverse psychology Poo Poo. Because shit is shit there is no need to turn back - all is shit. Instead, lets look/move forward to where there is no shit. Let's forget about all the nasty sinister wrong doings perpetrated against Daniel Anderson and ALL Parramatta Eels fans by board members (and sponsor), the same board members (and sponsor) who are still in positions of power today looking/moving forward to where there is no shit. How convenient Poo Poo.

An analogy/metaphor...... With the Queen (some of the directors) in power her people have gone through democracy, communism, socialism, dictatorship, war, death, destruction, etc, and while the chaos ensues, she's still in power". At an arms length, what if the Queen was responsible for orchestrating all these events so she and all her beneficiaries, known and unknown, can remain in power and gain even more influential power and control over her people (club/fans)?

 

[Eels Dude]

How many of them brought Peter Nolan on board to recruit into the academy?

I forgot Peter Nolan was the second coming of Jesus. Let's see what results he gets with his junior recruiting before heaping praise on him.

 

[Casper The Ghost]

I know as much as you do: that he was sacked by his employers and hasn't been employed in that role by any other club.

Given the board wanted a good coach, but didn't want him, and that other clubs have since needed a first grade coach, but for some reason he hasn't been picked up by any of them, the balance of probability says he's probably not as good a coach as you think he is.

That's not to say he's not an extremely smart coach; to end up coaching first grade despite never having played at that level is an incredible effort, and he can only have lasted as long as he did on his rugby league and managerial knowledge.

But in a world of globalised communications, knowledge is easy to get. Far more important is the ability to influence people, and I believe in the end that Anderson was found lacking in that area.

Just my opinion, but I am very intelligent and unlike you I try to be impartial. I'm one of the few people here to publicly admit I've been wrong, and I'm prepared to admit it in the future.

But mostly I avoid making definitive statements so I don't have to go through all that.

But this does not change the fact that you were not there and have no idea at all as to what was really going on back then. It's just your opinion Poo Poo. You would be lying and committing fraud if you tried to impersonate Daniel Anderson, acting as if your thoughts, ideas, opinions, etc, are Daniel Anderson's. Are you psychic Poo Poo? Do you like to practise black magic as in remote viewing, remote projection and remote control? Do you enjoy acting as an impostor of Daniel Anderson, remotely viewing the influence and control over as many people as possible, while seducing them with your projection/performance/act of Daniel Anderson, giving them the impression they are Daniel Anderson's thoughts, feelings, intentions, acts, etc?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Were you there?
Do you have the evidence?

He was either sacked for interpersonal issues or lack of knowledge. I've just demonstrated why it couldn't have been lack of knowledge; deduction tells us the rest.

But if you've got any evidence for why your bullshit conspiracy theory is more likely than the above, either put up or shut up.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I forgot Peter Nolan was the second coming of Jesus. Let's see what results he gets with his junior recruiting before heaping praise on him.

Mate he is the Des Hasler of recruiting.

Do we have to wait and see what results Des gets with the Bulldogs before heaping praise on him?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

But this does not change the fact that you were not there and have no idea at all as to what was really going on back then. It's just your opinion Poo Poo. You would be lying and committing fraud if you tried to impersonate Daniel Anderson, acting as if your thoughts, ideas, opinions, etc, are Daniel Anderson's. Are you psychic Poo Poo? Do you like to practise black magic as in remote viewing, remote projection and remote control? Do you enjoy acting as an impostor of Daniel Anderson, remotely viewing the influence and control over as many people as possible, while seducing them with your projection/performance/act of Daniel Anderson, giving them the impression they are Daniel Anderson's thoughts, feelings, intentions, acts, etc?

I'm not saying I was there you f**king idiot; I'm talking about what is most likely - by using the facts we know, and the powers of logic.

Your postulate - that Anderson was sacked because he was hired by the previous board - is so unlikely as to be a conspiracy theory. It's also so f**king petty that for you to believe it says a lot about how your mind works.

This belief, coupled with your rabid yes-man posts whenever you agree with another poster, shows that you are an emotionally immature, disturbed individual.

And you are the last person who should be asking other people to back up their opinions.

 

[Casper The Ghost]

He was either sacked for interpersonal issues or lack of knowledge. I've just demonstrated why it couldn't have been lack of knowledge; deduction tells us the rest.

But if you've got any evidence for why your bullshit conspiracy theory is more likely than the above, either put up or shut up.

There is a BIG difference between conspiracy theories and organised crime Poo Poo. In whatever way they choose to apply it, "Conspiracy Theories" are used by perpetrators as whitewashing/whiteanting tactics to diminish the effect of the power of truth over the people because they know the truth will ruin them and their dreams if it was to spread all around. There appears to be sufficient factual evidence available which proves that many lies were used as part of an organised agenda against Daniel Anderson and some of the perpetrators are present board directors. It's up to the members and fans to do something powerful about it. What they did was shit. What we got now is shit and the shit is what we will still have for a long-time to come if we don't clean it all up. This means going back into the past where all the shit was created, and move forward from their cleaning up all the shit and the shit makers along the way.

 

[Casper The Ghost]

I'm not saying I was there you f**king idiot; I'm talking about what is most likely - by using the facts we know, and the powers of logic.

Using facts and the powers of logic being exclusive ONLY for you!
What planet did you say you were from conehead?

Your postulate - that Anderson was sacked because he was hired by the previous board - is so unlikely as to be a conspiracy theory. It's also so f**king petty that for you to believe it says a lot about how your mind works.

Until the truth comes out about what really happened, when we hear it from the horses mouth, you have no basis in fact to tell me that my views are just a conspiracy theory and that yours are deserving of a higher ground.

This belief, coupled with your rabid yes-man posts whenever you agree with another poster, shows that you are an emotionally immature, disturbed individual.

I've agreed with some of your previous posts dickhead.
Wel that means everyone in this forum are emotionally immature, disturbed individuals.
It's extremely rare for a forumite to never agree with any comment/point of view posted in this forum.
Finally, you are starting to make some sense! :crazy::sarcasm::roll:

And you are the last person who should be asking other people to back up their opinions.

And what is wrong with scrutinising information?
Should we just accept everything stated on face value?

It's OK, all is good, nothing to worry about. Just sit back, relax, with remote control, Maccas and a beer in hand. Just leave it to someone/anyone with a magic wand who'll come along and with one whoosh fix up all the problems. Just pass the buck. No worries mate - she'll be right mate - they'll sort it out mate.....

 

[lingard]

Clearly it doesn't take as long to prove you can't do it as it does to prove you can.

If Anderson was any good the club would have kept him. Anything else is a bullshit conspiracy theory.

Don't believe everything you read on Casper's website.

Do you honestly believe that the board/CEO of our club can`t make a mistake? Or do you just enjoy taking a position and arguing it to the bitter end no matter what?

 

[parra-matters]

Can people just get over the past and move into the present and future?
This is what is holding this club back.

 

[lingard]

I seem to recall that at the time part of DA's problem was that he hadn't put forward any plans for the future.
I don't think that DA's sacking was right but I do think that some people are building him up to be a wonder coach when he was struggling as much as Kearney yet, unlike Kearney, he had no plans in place for the club's future.

I think you`re fairly right. But Anderson did have a track record of getting into NRL grand finals (two) and winning premierships in England. Regardless, I don`t think this is or should be a contest between Kearney and Anderson (even though it is natural to compare an underperforming coach with his predecessor). We are all just pissed off at Kearney`s (record-breaking) lack of on-field success and his inability to inspire anyone with any confidence. (At least Daniel Anderson could talk!)

 

[Suitman]

I think you`re fairly right. But Anderson did have a track record of getting into NRL grand finals (two) and winning premierships in England.

After how many years of coaching?

Suity