THE*STORM*IDENTITY said:Could Strauss carry his bat? It would be a bloody good effort against the likes of Warne, McGrath & Lee
\\\\lockyno1 said:NO!:lol:
Tommy Smith said:Well that decision against Collingwood shoudl keep you all happy for a a while.
But no whinging from me, it happens. They go both ways and we move on.
Bloody Warney! He's too good. Incredibly mentally strong.
Twizzle said:I'd rather they gave Strauss out when he was plumb, and take 129 off thier score.
aussies1st said:Typical English. If they don't think its out why not show hawk eye.
Bowden had yet another shocker. He gave 2 no balls to Tait when his foot was behind the line. That guy isn't doing much right this whole series.
Tommy Smith said:Stop whining. Geezus. England got a bad decision but ive gotten over it. Honestly, whinge whinge whinge. It was hardly plumb, and btw im sure it was Trescothick and not Strauss so its not as if it cost you 120 runs. But to think people call us whinging poms!
Btw, hawkeye is a farce. When Warney got Bell plumb lbw the ball was a leg break which would have cleaned up middle. But Hawkeye showed the ball to be a wong 'un which would have just clipped leg! LOL What a farce and clearly unreliable technology.