Why is it that Manly are the team always brought up for discussion to move elsewhere when we have Parramatta, Canterbury and Wests all living in each others pocket? Surely if a team is to be moved it would be one of them? You can even throw Souffs in there who are now living out of Homebush.
Yes the inevitible whinging from fans of those clubs is on its way but whatever.
And if the Bears come back in from 2015, how much of that potential do they take away? They are after all claiming they'll reconnect with the North Shore and the big end of town. Surely that won't help if the Sea Eagles are already struggling now with the entire area to themselves.Manly definetly has a large enough of an area to grow their brand in, we need to take advantage of that, we need to market our brand better (let's see what Perry does) and get an upgraded stadium, we then, imo would be one of the bigger clubs in Sydney..
Why is it that Manly are the team always brought up for discussion
Here we go :roll:no fans
no juniors
no decent ground
no future
If we can sucessfully expand the brand further that way, then don't bring the Bears back.And if the Bears come back in from 2015, how much of that potential do they take away? They are after all claiming they'll reconnect with the North Shore and the big end of town. Surely that won't help if the Sea Eagles are already struggling now with the entire area to themselves.
Leigh.
And if the Bears come back in from 2015, how much of that potential do they take away? They are after all claiming they'll reconnect with the North Shore and the big end of town. Surely that won't help if the Sea Eagles are already struggling now with the entire area to themselves.
Leigh.
Add to that the fact that Brookvale Oval is just about the worst stadium of an RL ground
That's the point of a Commission co-ordinated deal for the Sea Eagles season ticket I suggested. A ten year agreement for a Sydney season ticket with six games at the SFS, five away games (Roosters, Dragons, Tigers, Rabbitohs, Bulldogs or Sharks) and one home game (Bears). Sea Eagles to get 10% commission on each away ticket sold to its fans. NRL to guarantee express public transport from Brookvale for games.Why not just start a new team up at the Sunshine Coast or Perth or CC or wherever - I don't get why it should require the relocation of established Sydney clubs. I'm not sure who the OP supports, but most Sydney rugby league supporters would not like seeing another Sydney club leave, mainly because (a) you'll lose a traditional rivalry, which cannot be manufactured, and (b) you'll probably miss that particular away game. The best games in Sydney are the ones where you play another Sydney club (although I like it when Melbourne visit)...
That's the point of a Commission co-ordinated deal for the Sea Eagles season ticket I suggested. A ten year agreement for a Sydney season ticket with six games at the SFS, five away games (Roosters, Dragons, Tigers, Rabbitohs, Bulldogs or Sharks) and one home game (Bears). Sea Eagles to get 10% commission on each away ticket sold to its fans. NRL to guarantee express public transport from Brookvale for games.
Rival clubs get bigger gates from the Sea Eagles delivering their fans as a block to games in Sydney. The Sea Eagles get a percentage of all sales to their own Sydney based supporters (on top of eleven home games on the Sunshine Coast). The NRL provides game day transport to the closest stadium to Brookvale and the best Rugby League facility in Sydney. Fans of both clubs get to keep watching these traditional rivalries between "Sydney" teams.
Leigh.
That's all well and good for starting a round of recriminations. The more important questions are how do we sort it out now we're in this situation? Do we allow another $50m to $100m to be spent on Brookvale and commit as a game to having a franchise there while we're looking to base a team at the modern existing facility in Gosford? Do we really want two franchises competing in the northern Sydney / Central Coast region? And if not, what do we do about the Bears?If all of this expansion was done right in the 90's then all Sydney teams bar Penrith would have merged with another team and we'd already have a Central Coast/Manly team in existance.
It's too late for that to happen now the NRL have to risk alienating a group of fans by relocating or killing off a team. They can't even bribe existing teams to move to the Central Coast as it is.
This is a big mess all because it wasn't done right the first time.
What's Sydney centric about it? The players and staff live and train on the Sunshine Coast, and they host eleven home games there each season. I suggested that their relocation grant would need to be $10m up front to cover the costs of physically relocating and then $1m extra per year for ten years to market themselves to their new fanbase. Beyond that, what happens in Sydney with 5 of their away games and their 12th home game really isn't relevant to getting established on the Sunshine Coast and engaging with that community.They're some nifty little ideas, but I'm not sure whether this arrangement would create much support up on the Sunshine Coast, who would no doubt rather have their own club. If the Manly Warringah Sea Eagles are anywhere near as disliked up in QLD as they are in NSW, I can't see the local population really getting behind the team, especially if the team remains so Sydney-centric.
That's the point of a Commission co-ordinated deal for the Sea Eagles season ticket I suggested. A ten year agreement for a Sydney season ticket with six games at the SFS, five away games (Roosters, Dragons, Tigers, Rabbitohs, Bulldogs or Sharks) and one home game (Bears). Sea Eagles to get 10% commission on each away ticket sold to its fans. NRL to guarantee express public transport from Brookvale for games.
Rival clubs get bigger gates from the Sea Eagles delivering their fans as a block to games in Sydney. The Sea Eagles get a percentage of all sales to their own Sydney based supporters (on top of eleven home games on the Sunshine Coast). The NRL provides game day transport to the closest stadium to Brookvale and the best Rugby League facility in Sydney. Fans of both clubs get to keep watching these traditional rivalries between "Sydney" teams.
Leigh.
That's all well and good for starting a round of recriminations. The more important questions are how do we sort it out now we're in this situation? Do we allow another $50m to $100m to be spent on Brookvale and commit as a game to having a franchise there while we're looking to base a team at the modern existing facility in Gosford? Do we really want two franchises competing in the northern Sydney / Central Coast region? And if not, what do we do about the Bears?
Leigh
What's Sydney centric about it? The players and staff live and train on the Sunshine Coast, and they host eleven home games there each season. I suggested that their relocation grant would need to be $10m up front to cover the costs of physically relocating and then $1m extra per year for ten years to market themselves to their new fanbase. Beyond that, what happens in Sydney with 5 of their away games and their 12th home game really isn't relevant to getting established on the Sunshine Coast and engaging with that community.
Leigh.