I will, I’m taking the $500k govt money, heading to crown and will fund the tens of millions from my winnings.
Sounds like only way it'll get up
I will, I’m taking the $500k govt money, heading to crown and will fund the tens of millions from my winnings.
Perth or Adelaide would add TV revenue
PNG would add juniors
NZ2 would add a bit of both
What’s the issue here?
How much did nine pay for brisbane2?Lol, nobody watches in Adelaide & Perth. TV wanted bris2 over Perth. Nine said recently they wanted more se qld teams
Wb, pneuma et al.U too. Unfortunately, looks like certain posters have spent the last two months just repeating the same stuff they've been spewing for years..
Breaking news, peoples opinions not changed by anonymous posters on an internet forum, lolWb, pneuma et al.
So the Melbourne Storm should never have been admitted in the first place....that is all. I find it funny when fans say NRL needs Perth or Adelaide. Unless a city can tick the aforementioned boxes they are not needed & in fact should be avoided. Fans are too obsessed with game becoming "national" but that has nothing to do with the game getting stronger & richer. A non heartland team may require decades of funding & never generate a return or develop a junior.
News Ltd like they did for the Storms first 13 yearsSounds great. Who's pumping in the 10's of million a year needed to keep the club going?!
He's trolling, most NRL clubs dont generate tens of millions a year. They spend $25-30mill of which $17mill comes from the NRL. Any new club will need to generate around $12-15mill a year in football club operations to stay viable.News Ltd like they did for the Storms first 13 years
So the Melbourne Storm should never have been admitted in the first place.
He's trolling, most NRL clubs dont generate tens of millions a year. They spend $25-30mill of which $17mill comes from the NRL. Any new club will need to generate around $12-15mill a year in football club operations to stay viable.
20k members, 15k crowd avg, reasonable merch sales and a full sponsorship portfolio achieves that. A new club should not need extra funding if its run right.
View attachment 74128
I expect a well run Perth club will conservatively to be abale to generate:
$4mill gate and membership + $10mill sponsorship + $1.5mill merch = $15.5mill FC revenue. + $17mill NRL grant = $32.5mill operational budget.
WA Govt giving us a good rental rate on HBF park will also see the revenue go further.
Yes but rugby league has always been more established in WA than it is in VIC.So the Melbourne Storm should never have been admitted in the first place.
As a single State club Perth will have plenty of money and if the Bears are involved even more guaranteed backersWookie already shi..all over ur "math". Ur projected sponsorship is higher than even the dockers!!
When team is losing ur going to need sugar daddy to keep club going.
As a single State club Perth will have plenty of money and if the Bears are involved even more guaranteed backers
Yes but rugby league has always been more established in WA than it is in VIC.
You mentioned lack of juniors and new teams running at a loss which sounds a lot like the Melbourne Storm especially during their formative years.
As a single State club Perth will have plenty of money and if the Bears are involved even more guaranteed backers
Proceeds to whinge about repetitive posting whilst typing the same dribble he posted months ago.
I'm happy that wb1234 has remembered his alt account's password. Well done old chap, you can finally agree with yourself.
Troll done good.Perth will never happen. Stop caring too much to deal with it
Troll done good.
we’ve missed you, said no-one.