scare mongering
Mate you're slow enough as it is. Newcastle is a one RL team town and their team (who I assume you support) only entered the NSWRL comp in 1988. Hence you wouldn't appreciate or understand the tribal nature of the Sydney based teams, some of which have been around for 100 years and have hundreds of thousands of fans, many of whom are now dispersed all around Australia as well as overseas.Ive never disputed the expansion plan mate. All I have commented on is the scare mongering from fans like you about how we'll lose fans/players/juniors to AFL if a Sydney club folds.
Ill try and go slower next time so you wont get so confused.
Mate you're slow enough as it is. Newcastle is one RL team town and their team (who I assume you support) only entered the NSWRL comp in 1988. Hence you wouldn't appreciate or understand the tribal nature of the Sydney based teams, some of which have been around for 100 years and have hundreds of thousands of fans, many of whom are now dispersed all around Australia as well as overseas.
I have supported Souths my entire life and I can assure you that if they folded, I would not... I repeat NOT follow or become a member of any other RL club, merged or otherwise. I would no longer attend any games, buy merchandise, subscribe to Foxtel etc, so Rugby League would not be getting any more money from me. Likewise if Newcastle folded, would you switch to supporting Manly or Brisbane?... I think not. Most fans who have supported their club for their entire lives would feel the same way.
Are you that naive to think that if a number of Sydney clubs folded or were culled, that there would be no impact on the game or that AFL would not attempt to capitalise on the situation? It is not scare mongering, it is simply a business reality.
As I said before, the experiment of culling/merging Sydney clubs was tried before during the Super League years and was a monumental failure that took years to recover from, with many fans being lost from the game. To attempt to go down that path again would be insane and would not be supported by Gallop nor any other RL administrator or club CEO for that matter (with the exception of Ribot).
Yes, we should continue to expand the game nationally, but not at the risk of losing Sydney clubs that have been around for several generations and have hundreds of thousands of fans.
It's quite simple really... if a club disappears, the fans disappear, the juniors disappear and a void is left for the 3 other football codes to exploit... it's called business. Get it now?
Mate you're slow enough as it is. Newcastle is one RL team town and their team (who I assume you support) only entered the NSWRL comp in 1988. Hence you wouldn't appreciate or understand the tribal nature of the Sydney based teams, some of which have been around for 100 years and have hundreds of thousands of fans, many of whom are now dispersed all around Australia as well as overseas.
I have supported Souths my entire life and I can assure you that if they folded, I would not... I repeat NOT follow or become a member of any other RL club, merged or otherwise. I would no longer attend any games, buy merchandise, subscribe to Foxtel etc, so Rugby League would not be getting any more money from me. Likewise if Newcastle folded, would you switch to supporting Manly or Brisbane?... I think not. Most fans who have supported their club for their entire lives would feel the same way.
"intimate understanding of Sydney's culture"... lol. Since when has Wollongong been part of Sydney? You're just a RL fan who grew up in Wollongong who thinks they're more qualified and knowlegeable than any administrator in the NRL or all the various RL club owners/CEOs.... but you have NFI.So because Im not from Sydney means I dont get the concept of tribalism? I grew up in Wollongong mate and I have an intimate understanding of Sydneys culture when it comes to RL. Tribalism is important to our game that is true but not to the extent that the game will be run into the ground due to the governing body trying in vain to prop up clubs run by usless businessmen who cant seem to think of a better way to supply money to their club outside of pokies and chook raffles.
If you choose to be a rugby league team whore, that's fine, however, we are not all like you either and many of us would not give up on our team. If all Souths fans were like you, the Rabbitohs wouldn't have made it back into the comp, as according to you, we should have just accepted our fate and all become Roosters supporters. If the Bears fans were like you, they'd all be Manly supporters now, instead of mounting a bid to be readmitted into the NRL. Grow some balls dude.There you go again, assuming that just because you feel a certain way that everybody else must. Well to answer your question mate, yes I would support another club if the Knights folded because I love the game above all else and while it would gut me to lose the team I have supported since I was 9, I would not turn my back on the game that has given all of us so much. It saddens me that you put such a low value on that but its really not surprising.
Oh really.... were you asleep between 1995-1998? The damage that was done to Rubgy League during that SL period, set the game back 20 years.I have never suggested that there would be no impact but the RL world would certainly not come tumbling down as some posters on here would have everyone think.
Yes you are a bit slow, as it's not all about you precious, so don't flatter yourself. My comments in relation to the culling of Sydney teams were not directed at YOU, they were in response to the subject matter of this thread, i.e "But Gallop said securing the financial future of the current clubs was paramount, putting any expansion on the backburner"... a statement that I and many RL administrators, CEO's, sponsors and fans happen to agree with, despite calls from others on here that want fewer Sydney teams.Ill say it one more time mate, listen carefully : I AM NOT NOR DID I EVER SUGGEST ANY MERGERS OR CULLING. Ann you have the hide to call me slow
Ditto...*Sigh* See above and my last 3 posts.
So where are all those thousands of Steelers fans dude.... have SGI crowd attendances and memberships increased by "thousands" since the merger? No they haven't. As for the "dozens" of Magpies and Bears fans in here, I admire their loyalty. At least they are remaining true to their clubs, unlike yourself, who would simply support another club if the Knights failed.Ok mate, Ill tell the 1000s of Steelers fans who managed to still support the game that they simply dont exist. Where did you go during 2000 - 2001? Disappear did you? How about the dozens of Magpies and Bears fans who post on this very forum?
Mate i see where you're coming from, but seriously, if your missus passed away, you'd go through a grieving process but you wouldn't abstain from having a relationship with a another woman again. The sky won't fall. One day another sheila would catch your eye, and you're back on the dating scene again.
Its the same with footy clubs.:lol:
I follow several clubs depending how frisky i am, but Storm's my first team.
Pretty much. If there's no local top level team to go and watch easily, it starts to effect everything in the schools and playing fields from the top down as the years pass.Really? Do you honestly think if a team goes under then kids in those traditional suburbs of that team (although lets be honest many teams fans now move around a fair bit in this day and age) where RL will still be the No1 code on TV, in the papers, in the schools and on the playing fields will take no interest in RL because there isn't a team named after their suburb?
Yes. Have you seen the hammering league gets in the general press here? The slide in broadcasting coverage here in the last 20 years, from when we used to have four radio stations calling the games on weekends, sometimes three of them doing the same game! The number of (especially female, but also male) friends in Sydney who now have no interest in league at all, but previous to (perhaps Coffs?) would have called themselves a casual fan and had a "team" but now disown the code entirely?It seems many fans have such a low opinion of the sport that they feel having 7 or 8 teams in the sports heartland city will somehow give a wide open door for lesser sports to take over. Do you really feel our sport is that weak in Sydney?
It means what it says... When you talk about expansion, you have to remember that the the risk is that it would make survival for the 16 clubs we have got very difficult in the current climate. And above I have explained why we need to keep the Sydney clubs we have from going bust.ps has anyone found an answer to what Gallop meant by this? I am intrigued!~
"I think it is critically important that the 16 clubs that we have got are not going to easily deal with expansion,'' he said. "I think you always have to be looking at that when you talk about expansion."
Pretty much. If there's no local top level team to go and watch easily, it starts to effect everything in the schools and playing fields from the top down as the years pass.
Yes. Have you seen the hammering league gets in the general press here? The slide in broadcasting coverage here in the last 20 years, from when we used to have four radio stations calling the games on weekends, sometimes three of them doing the same game! The number of (especially female, but also male) friends in Sydney who now have no interest in league at all, but previous to (perhaps Coffs?) would have called themselves a casual fan and had a "team" but now disown the code entirely?
Cutting out a traditional team would be suicide, and Gallop is right to be getting behind the survival of all remaining Sydney clubs (admittedly even the Sharks).
It means what it says... When you talk about expansion, you have to remember that the the risk is that it would make survival for the 16 clubs we have got very difficult in the current climate. And above I have explained why we need to keep the Sydney clubs we have from going bust.
Another RL team whore ffs. I know a few of them... they support a different team from one year to the next, depending on who's winning or who's "cool" or which suburb they're living in at the time. They tend not to be financial members of any club, they don't buy merchandise and they don't attend games regularly. Not my scene, I'm afraid. ;-)Mate i see where you're coming from, but seriously, if your missus passed away, you'd go through a grieving process but you wouldn't abstain from having a relationship with a another woman again. The sky won't fall. One day another sheila would catch your eye, and you're back on the dating scene again.
Its the same with footy clubs.:lol:
I follow several clubs depending how frisky i am, but Storm's my first team.
Millsy, we're both just huge supporters of our respective clubs and the rivalry gets pretty intense at times. But deep down we all respect one another and we can have a beer and a laugh together.... that's what makes Rugby League so great. And that's exactly what the folks on here who want fewer Sydney teams don't understand.FMD I am starting to like you Nemisis. You better start bashing me so we can get back to the hate.
Another RL team whore ffs. I know a few of them... they support a different team from one year to the next, depending on who's winning or who's "cool" or which suburb they're living in at the time. They tend not to be financial members of any club, they don't buy merchandise and they don't attend games regularly. Not my scene, I'm afraid. ;-)