Yeah i thought Angels or Archangels, would suit Adelaide, with the perception of city of churches angle, but i also agree a relocation would help the city, in regards to depth in player squad/junior pathways as such
What about the Adelaide Saints?Yeah i thought Angels or Archangels, would suit Adelaide, with the perception of city of churches angle, but i also agree a relocation would help the city, in regards to depth in player squad/junior pathways as such
What about the Adelaide Saints?
I know that Saints is the Dragons secondary moniker but thought it played into the whole city of churches thing. Alternately (not saying this will happen or that I want it to happen) if St George move to Adelaide to become the Adelaide Saints.
That’s why those names are part of local teams... barring the toads (cane toads) they don’t really capture the imagination of a wider audience. The only reason the Roosters and Rabbits still exist is due to heritage. You’d be hard pressed finding a new team in the modern era that would name themselves with these monikers.There's already some good names out there for local teams
Goondiwindi Goannas (Touch)
Nambour Toads (Union)
Springsure Mountain Men (League)
That’s why those names are part of local teams... barring the toads (cane toads) they don’t really capture the imagination of a wider audience. The only reason the Roosters and Rabbits still exist is due to heritage. You’d be hard pressed finding a new team in the modern era that would name themselves with these monikers.
I like where your heart and mind are but unfortunately in today’s monopoly society the moniker needs to be marketable.
Let’s get the federal government behind them! Sign the petition, vote in the referendum, make them the people’s team.Great! Now I’ll have to let them all know that the Million$$$ they’ve put into their planned bids for the upcoming NRL expansion has been wasted. The Toads will be gutted.
i don't really know soccer and what the go with Man U and Man City is but isn't the City club usually the more inner city, rich, "glamour" club, I saw the Broncos more as the "city" club and the potential new club wanting to be different (and avoid the main problem people have with the bombers, they are basically the Broncos)Rather than United I'd go with Brisbane City, or Greater Brisbane, something that encapsulates the entirety of the sewage tank city so that they all know they're lumped in with it.
Came up with this in a different thread:
From the sound of things the best bet for a second Brisbane team is one that unites the whole city against the Broncos. They don't want to be the "little brother" they want to be a competitor.
So why not go the soccer route with "Brisbane United".
Being mascot-less means it's not going to turn away anyone who doesn't like a certain mascot because its used by an old/existing team or because they don't particularly like the animal or something.
View attachment 32916
I based the logo of the city's coat of arms/flag, but with a colour change because we don't really want another team in blue.
I guess if necessary some mascots could be derived from the logo like a doctor or snake or the Greek god Hermes (its his staff in the logo), or even a pretzel (idk why this would be the choice haha, the flag has the Stafford knot on it so thats why its there).
Or it could be something completely different that develops over time from the fans.
That's really good.
I see the logo is red and black, would that be the team's colours?
It's a traditional sports combination that's sorely missing in the NRL.. and to be honest the chances of the Bears coming back are slim at best, so it's open to takers I guess.
I'd love the Titans to re-brand to either the bid colours (teal & orange, Gold Coast Dolphins jersey.. just keeping the Titans name) or blue and maroon (a mix of Queensland & NSW colours, in honor of their place by the border)
Then Adelaide Angels or Rams (Red, blue, gold), and NZ Keas (Green/brown/orange) as teams 19 and 20
I can’t say I like the United or City part. I’d be doing all I could to avoid comparison to soccer/football. I know the Roosters sort of tried it when they became Sydney City, but a few years later they dropped the city part.Rather than United I'd go with Brisbane City, or Greater Brisbane, something that encapsulates the entirety of the sewage tank city so that they all know they're lumped in with it.