That could also work for a team named the Bull Ants.For membership drives..."Join the Colony".
Club ethos .."Our strength is our colony members".
Whilst the NRL club is named the "Sydney Roosters" the owner of the licence is still Easts. If they wanted to they could name themselves Easts tomorrow. Its still all over their training gear, memberships, social media, everything.got to be EAST, as in east BENGALS,TIGERS , cause sydney roosters are not named east now, any more,
keep the east brisbane club name, mascot
keep redcliffe dolphins aswell , dont change the name
Roosters were EASTERN SUBURBS ROOSTERS not EAST SUBURBS ROOSTERS am i wrong
east roosters, i dont remember that name
just let the name east go, let east Brisbane use it
then we go EAST BRISBANE BENGALS, makes sense
no clashing any name or mascot
Queensland cup has 2 seagulls clubs, am i right
nsw cup has 2 magpies clubs
redcliffe dolphins is very nice, works out, everyone will know and learn
there is no EAST , EASTS , club name in the NRL , its sydney roosters
and east bribane tigers, or bengals
ok so there is NO east in the NRL right now
i cant see why east brisbane cannot use there name in the NRL
SYDNEY roosters has never played under the name east roosters
eastern suburbs roosters are not the only team playing on the east coast
what about western suburbs magpies
do you support rugby league or just the sydney roosters
Easts is the shortened version on Eastern Suburbs. Any long time rugby league fan would know that. The Easts in Easts Tigers doesn't stand for East Brisbane, it is Eastern Suburbs Rugby League Football Club.... pretty much identical to the Roosters. So I would dare say the Roosters would have something to say about a new/another NRL club using the "Easts" name.
"If the tender process went ahead, we would need to look at our nickname because we accept that the Wests Tigers are already in the competition,”.
“We would have to consider other alternative names."
- Brian Torpy, Easts Tigers Chief Executive
Even the Chief executive of the club acknowledges that they would need to rebrand because of the Tigers and I doubt they would be heading down the Bengals line. Its essentially the same thing.
Yes, both QLD Cup and NSWRL have teams with the same name but they are only semi-professional and there isn't necessarily a licencing scheme to deconflict the brands. Essentially it is which ever clubs are willing and able to cough up the cash to be included will be included. You will find many double ups in those lower grade competitions. There aren't many, if any, full-time professional, national competitions that have two teams with the same name. It just doesn't work.
View attachment 36646
Just another random concept to throw out there. Thinking these guys could be based out in West Brisbane but play their games in Suncorp. I know it's similar to the Cowboys though so would be tough getting over the line. The colour scheme is fairly unique though.
western wranglersAny qld expansion club is basing their identity primarily off an anti-Broncos position.
The most obvious “f*ck you, Broncos” and a mascot that rides a horse. Its why Cowboys is so perfect for the 2nd qld team
(And trying to avoid this has always been one of the great failures of the GC clubs)
western wranglers