On the subject of juniors, in 2011, ME's final year, of the 29 players that played for the Panthers, 15 were local juniors. Of the 29 players 15 players played more than 10 games and six were local juniors*, in other words 6 of the regular 17 players were juniors. Quite a low representation and fitting with what the Panther's marketing manager told me at one of the games. ME doesn't watch the juniors and believes the club should find him players ie. signings when he needs them. His job is to coach, not to bring through juniors.
In 2015, the last year of Cleary's first four year stint as coach, 32 players were used and 16 were local juniors. Of the 32 players, 17 players played more than 10 games and 8 were local juniors. Not exactly a giant leap forward in blooding juniors into first grade.
in 2018, Griffins final year, 27 players were used and 21 were local juniors. Of the 27 players used,15 played more than 10 games and 11 were local juniors.
Griffin did a great job and bringing through juniors and the idea that Cleary was just as good at it doesn't seem to be supported by the facts. I also think the idea that the Panthers has good local junior development is just BS. If we did, we would have been playing semi finals much more regularly than we have. Griffin should be applauded for what he did, 3 from 3 and that's with a team of 21/27 local juniors. He had his flaws, but he believed in development more than any other coach we have had in the past.
NB: *For clarity, local juniors includes players who debuted with the Panthers but might have played in juniors elsewhere. Will Smith for example.
Griffin arrived at the club after afour year rebuild, we had two NYC premierships in the three years prior to his arrival. What were our NYC results like in the years prior to Ivan Clearys first stint? Nowhere near premierships. How was the junior pathways and systems back 2011? had they been re designed and reinvested in? No. Are you factoring that in at all? No of course not.