taipan
Referee
- Messages
- 22,500
My poor experiences of anz had nothing to do with the rake of the seats. It was so empty I could sit as close as I liked. Be very interested to see if the curtaining idea actually creates a more intimate stadium with a better atmosphere, if it doesn't then it will still feel a desolate spot that will not be appealing to fans to attend.
Scheduling won't make much difference unless they give the plum time spots to the tenant clubs and I can see the uproar from other clubs if that happens.
LOL My poor experiences initially at Shark Park when there was on one stand,became much better when there were two stands and then three stands.It's called updating.The crowds improved also.Just saying.
Does it actually sink in.The ground is not rectangularly configured at present, it seats 83,000 plus.The seating will be reduced, the stadium made rectangular,and I suggest more people under cover.
It's less to do with the rake of the seats, but more to do with bringing the action on the field closer to the fans in a modern stadium.People prefer atmosphere,comfort,timeslots and ability to get to a stadium at reasonable hours,
So scheduling an Eels v Tigers game on a Thursday night or 8 pm Friday ,will get about the same as a scheduled match in a new stadium at the same times.
Tell the state Govt to stop the funds, stop the boats,PR(the Fremantle Doctor0 has spoken for the NRL fans of Sydney.Bring all NRL games to Perff ,we'll fill the stadium ten times over.
The clubs may well whinge, but they will whinge a lot less than they do now,beacue Nein controls the scheduling for the majors.
You whine, before anything is up and operating.If you were around in 1930 ,you would have whinged about the Sydney Harbour Bridge being built,becaue there were b*gger all cars to use it.