Nice bullshit. And I don't mean that in a bad or rude way. I just think you are being disingenuous.
Your comparison with Sydney United is laughable.
I'm a Wanderers fan and I hate Sydney FC. But they have not done anything wrong here.
It is NOT the Roosters stadium. It is owned and run by Venues NSW. Just like the SCG, Commbank, Wollongong and Newcastle, as well as Accor. All of which share tenants.
Of course, clubs like SFC would want their home ground to appear to be their home ground on game day, just like the Waratahs would, or, the Matilda's, Wallabies or even the Socceroos for example.
I was quite happy for the 3 long term tenants to have their symbols attached to the front of the stadium, sort of.
But to have a major sign like the Roosters have at the back of the stadium speaks of Politis Power. Why couldn't there have been two more like that for SFC and the Waratahs? It's their home too.
History has nothing to do with it.
Commbank has seen nothing of this. It is a stadium that is shared, and every team that appears there puts their own mark on the stadium on game day with lighting, flagpoles on match day, food and merchandise stalls, entertainment etc......
It is not insecurity from football. It is about looking after their fans and making their game day experience all about their own team, not the Roosters.
Your argument is really petty.