Why would you take out games that they get large attendances for? Surely not just to cherry pick and make a biased point?
Do I need to spell it out to you?
The ARLC rigs the draw so that Sydney clubs are given Ch9 fixtures on public holidays to maximise attendance and television coverage for their sponsors. You don't see the ARLC dedicating these precious time slots to regional teams that could do with the additional media coverage for their sponsors and draw more revenue from the increased attendance.
It's a disgrace that the ANZAC Day game on Ch9 features two small Sydney clubs who average 10-16k on any other weekend. A game between the Raiders and Warriors would be more appropriate for ANZAC DAY as it features the Australian Capital Territory and the country that makes up the "NZ" in "ANZAC".
Townsville is a garrison city and was abandoned by the government in WWII after the bombing of Darwin, so there would be more historical relevance to hold a game in Townsville or Canberra between the Cowboys and Raiders.
Can you name me one NRL side that doesn't have a large drawing "event game on their calendar?
You can be so f**king daft.
A big game between two clubs isn't an "event" game if it's schedule on a normal day during a regular round.
The ANZAC Day, Easter Friday, Easter Sunday and Easter Monday games are "event" games designed to capitalise on the extra people who are at home. The ARLC rigs the draw so these time slots are give to low drawing Sydney clubs to inflate their attendances and provide extra exposure to their sponsors.
The Magic Round games are a chance for Sydney clubs to play in front of a large audience that they wouldn't draw in Sydney.
Hypothetical aside, why are Brisbane Easts "rich' now? What is there primary source of revenue?
Gaming machine revenue.
Doesn't change the fact they would offer far more to the NRL than any of the Sydney clubs by virtue of representing an underutilised rugby league market.