herbert henry1908
Referee
- Messages
- 21,880
If those renders are correct it’s a huge f*ck up
He's all talk, you'll see.
His responses give me hope that they haven’t actually signed the 25 year Grand Final deal yet. He seems to imply we still have some leverage to influence the final design. We’ll see.
Leigh.
Just to drive the point home. Roof extensions only cover bowl at ends of ground. Great if you’re a soccer fan, not so good for Rugby League.
View attachment 18717
View attachment 18718
Living in QLD I have mixed thoughts on Beattie, but his reply is encouraging.
His responses give me hope that they haven’t actually signed the 25 year Grand Final deal yet. He seems to imply we still have some leverage to influence the final design. We’ll see.
Leigh.
Living in QLD I have mixed thoughts on Beattie, but his reply is encouraging.
Beattie is also engaging with fans, something Todd doesn’t do
So in otherwords the ANZ stadium is the same lol just a paint job.
That seems to actually be on level 2, not part of the main bowl. Maybe a large outdoor bar area for the corporates? Given the top decks aren’t moving in I suppose they’ve got to make up some of that horizontal space somewhere.Can only hope these impressions were hastily arranged and don’t reflect the final design, the odd standing area behind the lower bowl might point towards that too? Surely it couldn’t look like that?
hes just telling you what you want to hear
His responses give me hope that they haven’t actually signed the 25 year Grand Final deal yet. He seems to imply we still have some leverage to influence the final design. We’ll see.
Leigh.
That’d be what those big standing areas on level 2 are for - to bring the bowl closer to the sideline without lowering the field too far. If instead of those they just kept digging down further they’d end up with a massive bowl and the near sideline out of sight of the upper decks.judging by those renders, anyone in the middle to back rows of the upper tiers wont be able to see the field, the angle just doesn't look great enough.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/na...s/news-story/2867b4d0d1ad6ec8c53ab5c1cc67bc8b
Stadiums backdown: Premier fails on two counts
Gladys Berejiklian had two political tasks today when she finally decided to back down on her stadiums decision.
- The Australian
- 4:46PM March 29, 2018
- Andrew Clennell
The first was to reduce the $2.5 billion spending on stadiums to such a level that the issue would become null and void for NSW voters — probably around the $1.6 billion that Mike Baird originally promised for three stadiums. The other was to communicate the issue so punters understood.
The Premier failed on both counts and, sadly, this issue is going nowhere, as the Labor Opposition is still able to argue the money would be better spent on schools and hospitals.
One thing the Premier could have done was reduce the proposed 45,000-seat Allianz Stadium in Moore Park to 30,000 capacity — the same as the Parramatta facility.
Together with turning the ANZ Stadium rebuild into a renovation, this would have brought the bill right down.
But the Sydney Cricket Ground Trust and Stuart Ayres have made a point of pushing hard for the 45,000-seat facility, to attempt to take events off ANZ Stadium and Sydney Olympic Park.
Part of the Allianz business case released yesterday actually suggests: “Possible course of action for the government might be to proceed on the basis of 40,000 seats as a minimum capacity and 45,000 seats as a target capacity, with the final stadium capacity to be determined once more detailed design work had been completed and before any tender documents were released to the market.”
This suggests an original plan by Ayres and the Trust to have a 55,000-seat facility could still come to fruition.
Opposition Leader Luke Foley was brutal. “This is rotten to the core; she’s building an entirely new stadium at Moore Park just to get Alan Jones (an SCG Trust member) editorialising for her every morning,” he claimed in a media conference.
Asked about Mr Foley’s comment, Mr Jones said: “Luke is a very silly man to be talking like that.”
The fact Ms Berejiklian would not reveal how many times she had spoken to Mr Jones on the issue yesterday did not help her cause. Also on the Trust is Ms Berejiklian’s mentor, former premier Barry O’Farrell, who was seen in Mr Ayres’ office in parliament a fortnight ago.
The Premier kept saying she had “listened to the community” and done her “homework”.
She seemed to have nothing else to say — unable to articulate in proper everyday language how she had listened and had responded to public outcry on the spend. Pride made sure that when asked if she would say sorry over the stadiums affair, she declined to do so.
At one point, ironically, she chastised Mr Ayres to use “everyday language”.
And Mr Ayres and Ms Berejiklian differed over whether she was going to abolish the SCG Trust; the Premier said it was possible, Mr Ayres said no.
It’s the fourth major backflip by Ms Berejiklian in her 13 months in the job.
Last November, she told a business audience: “When we make a decision, we make that decision clearly known and we stick to it.”
In fact, in her 12 months in the job, it has been exactly the opposite.
Two years ago on the Thursday before Easter, Mike Baird announced his stadiums position. It has taken that long for the debate to roll on without a sod turned.
yep
so leave it , why spend 800 Million on it when it won't be improved all that much
If the all powerful SCG Trust are the actual Govt & run the state & there is no way the plan for Allianz will change
then leave ANZ as is
don't touch it
& the 800 Million that was going to be the lipstick on that pig
put into Allianz & do it properly
a 70K seat super stadium with a roof that will be the envy of the world
its a better outcome then the dross being proposed atm
What I don’t get based on the render is how the stadium is losing 12,500 seats. The deep second tier at both ends would seem to make up a fair bit of what’s lost from the old bowl.I just don’t see even a 55,000 seat venue stealing many events off ANZ. Perhaps the bledisloe cup? But not promoter is going to want to lose out on that revenue. If it was closer, say only a 5,000 seat difference, then yeah.