- Messages
- 101,004
I think you have me confused with El Diablo.In future I'll just post photos of public toilets.
Then I'll be on the same page as you and Alan Jones at least.
I just don't agree with your diatribes
I think you have me confused with El Diablo.In future I'll just post photos of public toilets.
Then I'll be on the same page as you and Alan Jones at least.
Actually many people have talked about $730m being over the top for the SFS. Lots of people agree it just needed another $350m stadium like WSS.
And some of your stuff isn’t slight prodding, it’s outright silly.
To bring the facilities up to standard at the SFS would have cost hundreds of millions. Major structural work would’ve been involved.
A proper roof is.I didn't realise replacing seats and raising the height of handrails was major structural work.
A proper roof is.
You don't consider the proposed design to at least be a major improvement over the existing roof?Which you're not getting with the new one anyway.
You don't consider the proposed design to at least be a major improvement over the existing roof?
I'm of the opinion that it should be built like the WSS for the record.
I see I have another fan lol
I’d be surprised if stadiums built these days aren’t built with a 40-50year life span. Apart from capacity I can’t see too much evolution of stadiums in next few decades unless climate change kicks in even more and we end up needing fully enclosed stadiums in the future.
It’d be a great shame for fans if clubs choose to still play at anz when you’ve got the quality of wss for club games sitting there.
I didn't realise replacing seats and raising the height of handrails was major structural work.
That said, I am flummoxed as to why it costs $730 million for a stadium
Mate, it's modern Australia. Everyone takes the piss - consultants, contractors, overtime, variations - and for the cost, Aussie construction isn't efficient.
do you eat the old urinal soap cakes when you're replacing them?I'm sure they put forward the most expensive costing option forward to get the desired outcome.
If this was owned by Westfield, they'd find a cheaper way.
More like "don't agree with the forum thread line".I think you have me confused with El Diablo.
I just don't agree with your diatribes
Yes, it's all group think and none of us are capable of forming our own opinionsMore like "don't agree with the forum thread line".
Nah, it needs knocking down. It just doesn’t need a 730m stadium.
Mate, it's modern Australia. Everyone takes the piss - consultants, contractors, overtime, variations - and for the cost, Aussie construction isn't efficient.