unforgiven
Bench
- Messages
- 3,138
Yes but then you don't schedule those games at ANZ. ANZ should be a big game stadium only.That will only help if games that can draw 30k are not scheduled on Thu night or Fri 6pm
Yes but then you don't schedule those games at ANZ. ANZ should be a big game stadium only.That will only help if games that can draw 30k are not scheduled on Thu night or Fri 6pm
Yes but then you don't schedule those games at ANZ. ANZ should be a big game stadium only.
And you've been saying they will fold any minute for 10 you low f**kI heard sharks where going to be the richest club in the nrl, that was about six years ago!
Maybe that will be the compromise that avoids a hole in the ground for half a decade or so.but Labor could end them with a single piece of legislation.
Tigers do not use it anymore and exactly, it should only really be used for special event regular club games.But Dogs, Souths and Wests-Tigers already use it as a home base
So they would need an alternative arrangement for their games against out of town teams
WT abandoned it during this off-season and have moved those four games to Bankwest.But Dogs, Souths and Wests-Tigers already use it as a home base
So they would need an alternative arrangement for their games against out of town teams
South Sydney would probably use Bankwest too.
How long is Souths deal with Homebush?
Once Allianz is rebuilt - is there any deal on the horizon for them to move back there?
They’ve done really well financially by playing at Homebush in recent years, but with the biggest membership base of the Sydney clubs (I think?) and a new home closer to their heartland - even as an opposition supporter I’d love to see them fill up the new Allianz regularly - which I think they would be a good chance of doing
Souths' deal is long term as far as I know, but they'd need to find somewhere alternative during any ANZ upgrades - Bankwest would probably make more sense as SFS is unlikely to be ready.
I imagine they didnt just move to ANZ for the stadium deal. I reckon demographic shifts have moved their supports (potential supports) West.
I imagine theyd move to WSS before they went back to SFS
But what about schools and hospitals?
I imagine they didnt just move to ANZ for the stadium deal. I reckon demographic shifts have moved their supports (potential supports) West.
I imagine theyd move to WSS before they went back to SFS
Actually one of the big reasons for the move was because they did get a good deal at ANZ. In fact Souths complained publicly that they could not get as good a deal for the SFS as the Roosters did
If Homebush does get the rebuild, at the end of this year. It think Souths taking half their Sydney games to Wss & Scg/New sfs, would be the way to go.Yeh, i know that was the reason for the move in 06, but they havent looked likely to move back since and crowds have boomed for them in the west.
If we are gonna get another SFS tennant, i think StG are more likely than Souths.
Hard to see that happening, Saints fans have been highly resistent to anything but ANZAC Day being played away from Kogarah & Gong.If we are gonna get another SFS tennant, i think StG are more likely than Souths.
If Homebush does get the rebuild, at the end of this year. It think Souths taking half their Sydney games to Wss & Scg/New sfs, would be the way to go.
Yeah fair point about demographics shift, which can be said about a few other clubs. Souffs do get fairly decent crowds out there.
I’d still think if all things are equal that if both stadiums are up (bankwest and SFS) that the SFS would be a far better option. Parramatta is a long way from heartland Redfern. But I suppose Souths fans as a whole would be better positioned to answer that.
On a completely different note - your user name here.... Did you get it from the name of a horse that won the Dubbo Cup or similar?
It’s a great racehorse name for mine!
Hard to see that happening, Saints fans have been highly resistent to anything but ANZAC Day being played away from Kogarah & Gong.