VictoryFC
Bench
- Messages
- 3,786
One thing we have not touched on here is the cost of constructions with bigger stadiums. Take ANZ Stadium for example, obviously it was built with the Olympics in mind, but today when you think that the only times it gets anywhere close to a capacity is the NRL grand final and state of origin which is 2 or 3 times a year you have to ask the question do we need a stadium that holds 80,000 plus. I am no construction expert but I can only imagine a stadium that has a capacity of 65,000 would be a cheaper option and seriously would still meet our needs.
Completely agree but it's a non-starter. Because the MCG exists, it seems like most people want to have a large 80-100k stadium so that it can attract international events and have a grand final attendance which isn't too far of auskick's.
Of course, they completely ignore the fact that a 60-65,000 world class venue would be ideal for any major NRL, NFL, soccer or union, and would actually be preferred to the MCG or Optus by most international sports teams. It's a complete myth that you need a massive stadium to compete with MCG.
I'd much rather see a 60k stadium replace ANZ, and a 30k stadium replace SFS. And I'd make that 60k stadium modular in the way that Atlanta's is - ability to use curtains to make it have a 20-30k compact mode.
Last edited: