Tigerm
Coach
- Messages
- 11,705
‘Convince him’: Contract call that could define Tigers era — and ‘real battle’ that looms for Benji
‘Convince him’: Contract call that could define Tigers era — and ‘real battle’ that looms for Benji

Good point. However, on that list, there's only one ½ and Galvin, imo has the potential to be a player in the mould of Fitler, or ever Johns.....and no I'm not on meds. That's what I think of Galvin's future potential.
We must be the best click bait.
That's closer to the truth.Best thing we can do is keep winning. If we somehow play finals, Galvin will stay. If we finish bottom 4, then he'll walk.
It certainly all comes down to this.If we are bottom 4 the NRL may as well fold WT coz it will become a house of cards beyond rescue.Luai will also be using his get out clause coz with his experience & dearth of quality halves he will command a more lucrative deal than he’s currently on irrespective of his form this season.That's closer to the truth.
I hope he stays as well, every judge in the game says he has a great future.Galvin’s advantages over Heath Mason are size, and possibly a little bit longer kicking game. Mason in the halves would do every bit as well in attack, he has speed, a lethal step, good brain and great hands. Id hazard to say Mason’s short kicking game is more selective and accurate. I see it as a bit of a tragedy that Mason won’t get a run in the halves. Then you’ve got Latu, exciting, skilful but maybe a bit too flash at this age and will make mistakes. Both Mason and Latu maybe fall a bit short of Galvin in defence but Galvin isn’t perfect in that area either (but then who is). I’d love for Galvin to stay and be our 5/8 for ten years or so, but I’m not sure his leaving would be a tragedy
I’d love for Galvin to stay and be our 5/8 for ten years or so, but I’m not sure his leaving would be a tragedy
This is the way I see it but the proviso to me is that retaining Galvin on good dollars could be bad for the club.
We have Latu and Mason at the club as well.
I'm not convinced he is an all time great right now and that is the hype.
Whilst Latu and Mason play better with more NRL experience they get, I don't think neither of them have the potential of being another Brad Fitler. However in Galvin.....absolutely.
Galvin is a taller body, with a bit of room he has a good body swerve, his kicking game will improve and he's as fit as a fiddle. He has good situational awareness.If anything I think the opposite. Galvin doesn't have a step. He doesn't have the ability to bust the line. The other two have that ability.
I think if Galvin becomes as good as the hype he'll be his own sort of player. He sort of reminds me of Terry Lamb if anything. He can defend, make a bust and throw a good ball but his main attribute is his involvement and in particular backing up. Lamb was a great player but more like a club great rather than an all time great. If Galvin gets to that level I'd be surprised. There haven't been many better than one Terry dickhead Lamb.