He came straight in calling people dimwits for not knowing the nuances of the legal system and even when things were clarified that no one wants May convicted without proper processes he kept insisting we've convicted him. He insulted first and got what he gave.
I even went to the effort and gave him the courtesy of an extra message this morning to try and mend the misunderstanding because I think fundamentally we agree in principle.
If that's not good enough for you it's a you problem.
I didn’t come in straight off the bat critizing anybody.
I thought I made an objective attempt to put forward reasonable propositions about issues that are not yet known.
I attempted rather unsuccessfully to put forward issues based on my extensive knowledge of criminal law, despite which few wanted a bar of it, one poster rather gratuitously accused of being a forum police officer so to speak.
I stand by everything I have written and said. But let’s be clear about this I only ever intended to provide informed information.
I was very clear on the overriding issue, which is persons involved in committing DV related crime need to be punished accordingly.