What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Gold Coast drop Dolphin

doctor death

Juniors
Messages
364
Bomber said:
1. State and federal governments
2. Carrara if it can be modified; Robina otherwise
3. You idiot
4. You idiot
5. You idiot

Bomber, you jerk, look at the facts:

fact is - GC don't have stadium and there are NO guarantees. Next thing, you'll be saying "I believe in politicians' promises").

GC have said they have $10 million. Enough for one year. No more. Just promises. Not good enough.

Sustainable crowds are the issue - not just having several good crowds several times in 10 years with an NRL trial. Stats show that average GC crowds were around 7-8,000 only.

It is Victorians and South Australians who provide the major influx to GC area - they are AFL fans and will remain that way.

Why don't you contribute something worthwhile? Idiot.

CC Bears bid has EVERY facet covered. has been that way for over 7 years. To even consider the GC bid might win is a fraud in itself.
 

SpaceMonkey

Immortal
Messages
40,865
DIEHARD said:
- I pray we don't get a gay logo. I'm a fan of Titans or Gladiators. Pirates might be OK...
Just don't even think about Orcas ;-)

How about something acutally Australian sounding? Weren't the Broncos and Cowboys originally supposed to be the Brumbies and Crocodiles, but got changed to their current (far too American sounding) names for different reasons? Don't make the same mistake with the GC bid.
 

mightybears

Bench
Messages
4,342
Razor said:
Well if the GC dropped the Dolphin name because a QLD cup team has the Dolphins name, are the CC going to drop the Bears name because a QLD cup team has the Bears name?

do you actually think before posting?
 

mightybears

Bench
Messages
4,342
DIEHARD said:
So it would be between Pirates, Bulls, Titans and Gladiators.

Pirates, Titans and Gladiators would be my picks.

lets start again diehard
you had problems understanding the redcliffe dolphins LEGAL issue, so ask yourself which queensland based state wide sporting entity will have a problem with bulls?

and gladiators!
please, how lame
just waiting for you to ditch bruce for a nice picture of rusty, alliteration man, GOLD COAST GLADIATORS :lol:

can't wait for the CHARGERS
strangely a name that reflects a real gold coast rugby league heritage, not stolen from someone else
 
Messages
4,975
Oh look......the Bears fans still think thei struggling little Premier League side should get back into the NRL.


And why?


Because there is a Stadium in Gosford! :roll:
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
154,287
DIEHARD said:
Apparently on the Footy Show they said they would have a vote with the remaining names from the original vote.

So it would be between Pirates, Bulls, Titans and Gladiators.

Pirates, Titans and Gladiators would be my picks.

Fans could wave skull and cross bones flags.

why is it, that with all the creative geniuses behind a new bid, that they cannot come up with an original name

instead they have to blindy follow american NHL or NFL teams

what's wrong with being Australian

since when did we ever have Gladiators, Titans or Pirates in Australia.

don't get me wrong, I all for the Gold Coast bid, but lets be original
 

0neye

Guest
Messages
5,545
Gold Coast have removed a major obstacle to their proposed return to the premiership in 2007 by dropping the nickname Dolphins.

The bid team was involved in litigation with Queensland Cup club Redcliffe over the use of the name, and the Australian Rugby League sided with Redcliffe.

John McDonald, an ARL nominee to the NRL partnership board, told the Herald last Wednesday that Gold Coast could not expect to get back into the premiership as the Dolphins.

"We have resolved the drop the name," bid managing director Michael Searle said. "We'll go back to the drawing board and look for a new one. After a lot of soul-searching, we decided it was best not to take the matter to court."

It's understood they want another maritime name but the Sharks and the Orcas are taken.
 

mightybears

Bench
Messages
4,342
A REAL name competition
with no dodgy prompting by newslimited
an australian name
not being used by a sporting team in the same market, would do the trick
 
Messages
4,975
Why do the same old names get tossed up for news team in Australia and New Zealand.


I'dm like to see them just called The Gold Coast....have a good logo....two of those tall hotel towers with a banner saying "Gold Coast" strung between them so its like League goal posts.


That would be awesome.
 

mightybears

Bench
Messages
4,342
actually get PERMISSION from valleys and call themselves
the GOLD COAST DIEHARDS
at least one poster here will be happy
 

PARRA_FAN

Coach
Messages
17,873
Gold Coast Breakers is a good name, someone brought that up last year. I still prefer they go back to the Chargers, would be good to see captain Charger back, :D

Queensland deserves another team

Yeah so just cause they drop their name, doesnt mean theyre ruled of being included in the competition.
 

bender

Juniors
Messages
2,231
doctor death said:
DIEHARD said:
DIEHARD,

News Limited succeeded because of gullible, ignorant morons like you.
Diehard, played a big role in the success of Superleague :roll: :lol: THen with him supporting the Gold Coast, how can they lose?

Now the arrogant GC "Dolphins" should change their name to the GC Murdochs or the GC Ruperts - because they have a far inferior bid but the NRL and News Limited press are cheering them on at every turn.

I personally think they should use their tradition State League rep name (and colours) that they used to use. It gives their bid a whole new traditional side. Gold Coast Vikings. If they dont use that, Gold Coast Bears would have been great (joining with Gold Coast Burleigh) and again creating that tradition. With the Seagulls leagues link, it too would even tie in well with North Sydney, if they were to get involved, but obviously that isnt happening. Other than those three options, any name would do, it really isnt important.
Now that the name issue is settled, the fabulous GC bid only has a few gaps to cover:
1. $50 million to fund a stadium;

There is nothing wrong with Carrara Stadium. As is, it is better than the old Newcastle, no worse than places like Jubilee, Leichardt and Optus Park etc. Gold Coast can build it to suit themselves, as they go along. Carrara will do fine. It has first class lighting and while it is a little uncovered, needs some maintenance and seats are a little far away, it is better than the alternative, a 100km drive or 1000km flight.

2. Where will the stadium be built;
Where it is. The Robina Superstadium is another option, but if it doesnt happen, it just simply doesnt happen. Do you want to knock the bid because there is a chance they might get a better stadium?

3. where do they get money to last them beyond the first year;
From Sponsors and Crowd Receipts like everyone else?

Gold Coast is the 6th largest city in Australia, with possibly the 4th or 5th biggest economy in Australia, yet you think they cant raise money? Instead you prefer the 20th or so largest city in Australia, because they are backed by a millionaire. And one who has previously headed such succesful entities as Wests Magpies and Newtown Jets.

4. How do they improve their overall crowd averages of around 7,000 from the last time(s) they were in the comp;

They start by doubling their population, since they last entered the competition, that would get the crowds to about 14,000. Then that put a team on the field that might actually win a few games. This should give them another 5000-6000 bandwagon jumpers and instantly they have 20000 crowds which is coincidentally, roughly what they seem to get for trials isnt it?


5. Demographics - How do they convert lifelong AFL fans into rugby league followers when it is Mexicans flooding into the area.

Are these the same lifelong AFL supporters that used to average about 3000 a game when the Gold Coast had an AFL side? The 'Mexicans' who come up from Victoria, do so to escape victoria and embrace the Gold Coast way of life. Part of that way of life is rugby league. These people are far more willing to embrace RL than those who live in Melbourne. Besides that, their numbers are vastly overated. Gold Coast always has been and always will be a rugby league city.

For the first time, why don't you address the real issues and show how inferior the GC bid is compared to the CC Bears. Time to prove you're not just some blowhard Manly idiot like Cliffy.

The CC bears bid has a lot of strength, I warm to the bid more and more each day, particularly when i see the success of the Penrith side. But, it is just so far behind the Gold Coast in every area except stadium and even that is not the massive advantage everyone makes out. What more does a stadium need to do other than seat enough people? Everything else can be fixed with time. IMO, the Bears need to move full time to the CC now, and set about developing an invincible Central Coast super team at all levels (juniours to Seniors), not dissimilar to what Redcliffe Dolphins are trying to do, so that they are ready to step in as soon as there is an opening.(ie after Gold Coast and probably Wellington)
 

Hindyscrack

Bench
Messages
3,433
The Dr and his New Ltd paranoia, and we have a stadium crap...

The Fact is when the Gold Coast bid is up and running, it will be one of the most professionally run clubs controlled by people that have a clue about all facets of running a major sporting business.
 

Latest posts

Top