Bird has been stood down indefintely pending the outcome of the trial. What more do you want?
The club cannot legally sack him at this point in time.
Secondly, Bwaif is a lowlife dog pretending to be a league player. /discuss.
Its not about sacking mate, I dont recall mentioning the word.
Its your coaches attitude to the news. When it was Toad Carney he felt it was sweet to write an article condemming the bloke and his alleged actions, actions he wasnt even charged by the law for.
Then when it comes to his own player, he wants to wait to see the court outcome.
I wouldve thought that attitude comes across as very hypocritical????
No matter what you may want to deflect onto Bwaiff he comes out smelling like a sweet red riose compared to the absolute lowlife in question, you know it, I know it and Blind Freddy knows it.
But you see this is the attitude again. Instead of hands up it was me Im an arsehole, its deflect the blame, lets cover up and make weak arsed excuses.
Imagine how youd feel if say that was your sister or mother who was glassed???? How would you expect people to react then???? Imagine it was pRicks sister???? I wonder who would get the "benifit of doubt" in that case.
This weak arsed excuse ridden cover up attitude has gone on too long in all the se "boys" clubs. This incident HOPEFULLY will open up some ignorant eyes.
:sarcasm::sarcasm:
now that everyones had their say..................... she will be saying it was an accident. No ifs or buts
Therefore bird back on deck, great news.
I understand where you are coming from, but do you really think a coach is going to hang one of his players out to dry in a public press conference??
A cut of losing your shirt Quigs is a collar.
For Spides and the other legal eagles, a few examples from the Evidence Act 1995 to consider for Birdy's case:
Hearsay Examples:
(1) D is the defendant in a sexual assault trial. W has made a statement to the police that X told W that X had seen D leave a night club with the victim shortly before the sexual assault is alleged to have occurred. Unless an exception to the hearsay rule applies, evidence of what X told W cannot be given at the trial.
(2) P had told W that the handbrake on W's car did not work. Unless an exception to the hearsay rule applies, evidence of that statement cannot be given by P, W or anyone else to prove that the handbrake was defective.
(3) W had bought a video cassette recorder and written down its serial number on a document. Unless an exception to the hearsay rule applies, the document is inadmissible to prove that a video cassette recorder later found in D's possession was the video cassette recorder bought by W.
FMD this from a guy whose club went all out to sign Mason.
WTF has that got to do with Bird?FMD this from a guy whose club went all out to sign Mason.
No probably not mate but he didnt have to poke the finger at others especially knowing the nature of footballers and that old chestnutt Karma.
He has painted himself into a corner now as has the NRL. Threatening to de-register over a RUMOUR as they did with Carney, its gonna make this whole mess even messier.
I do feel for the majority of your fans, damn shame after a quality season.
:sarcasm::sarcasm:
now that everyones had their say..................... she will be saying it was an accident. No ifs or buts
I thought
now that everyones had their say..................... she will be saying it was an accident. No ifs or buts
Any chance of this being resolved before the semi's?
.Congrats, that's a big step forward for you.