carcharias
Immortal
- Messages
- 43,120
Well one great thing to come out of all this is '
The Sharkies now have another one eyed supporter.
The Sharkies now have another one eyed supporter.
I reckon they will definitely proceed. Remember she can be compelled to give evidence. If she refuses to answer or remains evasive it will probably lead to it be dismissed but the police will be seen to have done their job and not libel for costs etc.I don't think it will make it to court and if it does I think it would be more for the lie then the incident.
Would the club still want to act so harshly on that?
I think the smart business decision would be to keep bird, keep your best player happy and your coach happy. I know they are professionals but an unhappy sticky and unhappy gallen could be disastrous for us on the field which would unquestionably lead to bad news for us off the field. Just because we are at the top of the ladder this year and made some handy signings that does not mean we will be in this position next year - look at the Tigers after 05.
dont forget mate that domestic violence laws have changedI don't think it will make it to court and if it does I think it would be more for the lie then the incident.
but its the sponsors financial dealings that enable the club to field a teamI think the smart business decision would be to keep bird, keep your best player happy and your coach happy.
:lol:Well one great thing to come out of all this is '
The Sharkies now have another one eyed supporter.
I've tried to explain it as if he does have a case to answer and ways to achieve positive PR out of this like PKF did. I think its achievable but maybe that is my marketing degree talking and not my common sense :lol:your thoughts and dedication are of the utmost qualities K
but all this talk of birdy can do this, or do that, to make up for it - i get the feeling you may think he has a case to answer
i agree cheese, it will be a crying shame to lose the best lock we have had
dont forget mate that domestic violence laws have changed
its taken out of the hands of the victims these days, so if it does go to court i think bird will be in a bit of bother
but its the sponsors financial dealings that enable the club to field a team
off the back of everything the media has published, imo they only know 10% of what really occurred on that day
yes - but the only way his innocense can be proved is if it goes to courtI just think if he is innocent he should be back at the sharks next season.
it was a great opportunity for PKF to grab some from publicitywhat the sponser did was only to get themselves some media coverage, it was reported that it was a million dollar deal, i know that the sleeve sponsor deal is well off a million dollar deal , it struggles to get to triple figures, they can piss off for all i car and given that we performed this year we will get a more benificial deal for the coming years.
yes - but the only way his innocense can be proved is if it goes to court
yes - but the only way his innocense can be proved is if it goes to court
it was a great opportunity for PKF to grab some from publicity
and the million dollar deal is over 3 years, not 1
Hope you're right K
It would be bad to lose our best lock over one eggless breakfast
i agree media can tarnish and mud will stickThats not true. Even if it goes to court, the mud will stick & he will always be known for this incident.
she has not stated there was no attackthere are 2 people there, 2 are saying there was no attack.
Then there was no attack. End of story.
i thought it was $300k per season...?i PKF got an absolute bargain and then they go and try to throw some weight around please for under 100,000 a season kindly go and we will get what i believe we are worth.
Pity guys like reefy dont make as much sense as you do omni! Some of the ppl here are deluded....fair dinkum!!Oh please ... how can you possibly miss a cover up when it's whacking you over the head with a big sign saying "COVER UP IN PROGRESS" ?
If it was a genuine accident, Bird would not have asked his mate to take the blame, and lied to Zappa about the incident.
Forget about blaming the media, focus on the objective police facts. The police statements in the first hearing show there were serious inconsistencies in Bird's story. They were closest to the actual evidence, and they were absolutely unconvinced by his story. And they investigate a lot of domestic violence incidents.
Yes his girlfriend looks like being a defence witness now (bet that's never happened in a domestic violence case before!). And yes the prosecution case is already weakened.
But it won't matter - Bird is finished with the Sharks regardless of the court case outcome.
You're all scrambling pathetically to try to find mitigating circumstances for what he allegedly did. There is no valid excuse ... "accident" or not, I don't want someobe with his issues playing in a Sharks jersey again, no matter how good a player he is.
As a club we need to forget about the Bird case and focus on the job at hand - our best finals chance for 7 years.