What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Greg Inglis announces retirement from rugby league

Bazal

Post Whore
Messages
102,893
He did get a final game a couple of weeks ago v. The Dragons.

Mary was instrumental in sending him off with a win by not putting on the quick youngsters and target the attack down Inglis' side...

and the ungrateful prick hasn't even thanked him in his media circus of a retirement announcement.

It's probably for the best that he doesn't get a farewell game from here.

Souths are just preventing him from doing himself harm
 

super_coach

First Grade
Messages
5,061
re: Cap 'relief'

If he medically retires and Souths pay him the remainder of his contract, it should count.
If he quits his contract and Souths no longer pay him, it shouldn't count. Why would an imaginary salary count in the cap? Any other player that quits or is fired would immediately free up cap space.

Pretty simple. The cap is meant to count what clubs are actually paying.
When Matai or Stewart were medically retired, they still got paid their salary didn't they?


Not sure of the exact details, but when Liam Fulton was concussed out of his career the Tigers still had his contract on the salary cap for 18 months.
All you ask for is consistency when dealing with the NRL, but you have to remember Greenberg doesn’t like the word consistency
 

insert.pause

First Grade
Messages
6,456
So if other players decide they will retire with a couple yrs left on their contract, not for medical reasons, and declare they will sacrifice the value of their remaining contract, only to be employed by the club in another role, are we all just sweet with that now not being included on the cap?

It quite clearly advantages the wealthier clubs, allowing them to correct poor list management at the disadvantage of other clubs whose players could then become recruitment targets.

No matter how they dress it up, Inglis is not going to be shortchanged by his decision.
 

BranVan3000

Coach
Messages
12,289
I’m honestly gutted. An absolute legend of a player and I still find it hard to accept I’ll never see him run out again. I think the fact I didn’t get to savour his final games makes it harder, and I’m sad I didn’t get out to see his final game
 

Big Pete

Referee
Messages
29,108
One of the most talented players of his era. When he first hit the scene in 2005, he was producing some of the best plays of the competition and was just one of those players you enjoy watching. It's a shame it took so long for him to return to his natural position at fullback. As brilliant as Slater was, I can't help but feel that we were denied some of Inglis' best footy from 2007-10 because of it. Even when he left Melbourne, it took him a year to find his footing at Souths, but when he did he turned them into competition heavyweights.

My biggest memory of him was playing for Australia in the Tri Series in 2006. Australia had struggled with the ball all game and were set to lose the game pretty convincingly. Deep in their own half, Lockyer swings a pass out to GI, who proceeds to score one of the more effortless long-distance efforts I've seen in rep footy. It was like he was playing club footy in some local competition. That was the GI I remember, he could just make something happen out of nothing and there's been very few players with that ability.
 

Bodhi

Juniors
Messages
102
Thanks for the memories (that fend!) and good luck in retirement, GI. Awesome player.
 

firechild

First Grade
Messages
8,062
re: Cap 'relief'

If he medically retires and Souths pay him the remainder of his contract, it should count.
If he quits his contract and Souths no longer pay him, it shouldn't count. Why would an imaginary salary count in the cap? Any other player that quits or is fired would immediately free up cap space.

Pretty simple. The cap is meant to count what clubs are actually paying.
When Matai or Stewart were medically retired, they still got paid their salary didn't they?
Watmough retired and was paid by Parra but it was cap exempt.
 

AJB1102

First Grade
Messages
6,339
There’s no denying Inglis is one of the most talented players to ever lace on a pair of boots. He’d be an immortal if he had the necessary mental toughness required to push himself further and realise his potential. But...



He is also a cheat, a traitor, a grub, a domestic abuser and a menace to society. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out, Greg.

I don't see how that hearsay article proves he's a cheat even if it is true.

If you and your management are under the impression you can get pretty much anything you want, why not see if a boat is out of the question?

I imagine his manager said "they do anything to keep you so think about what you want". If my boss sat there granting wishes telling me he had authority to do so why not chuck a boat for dad on top?
 

The unknown

Juniors
Messages
2,495
Funny hearing some media calling him a future immortal. He is nowhere near immortal quality.

I think he deserves to be mentioned atleast. There was a 5 year period you could just pass him the ball and he would score a try out of nothing. Also destroyed blokes in defense on the reg

People seem to be blinded by his last 2 year's of how good he actually was.

His presence at Souffs was JT like with the cowboys, Souffs were f**king garbage for as long as I can remember and he helped turn them around into a premiership threat
 
Last edited:

Nevan_

First Grade
Messages
5,341
Inglis was a player whose natural talent was up there with the best we've seen in League history, but whose attitude prevented him becoming amongst the best we've seen in League history. But TBF, there's plenty of players past and present you could say the same about.

If I remember correctly, the Johns brothers claim that Owen Craigie was the most talented player they’ve seen. We all know how his career went.
I don't see how that hearsay article proves he's a cheat even if it is true.

If you and your management are under the impression you can get pretty much anything you want, why not see if a boat is out of the question?

I imagine his manager said "they do anything to keep you so think about what you want". If my boss sat there granting wishes telling me he had authority to do so why not chuck a boat for dad on top?

I’m sorry, but being too ignorant to realise that what was happening wasn’t above board is no excuse.
 

Latest posts

Top